View Full Version : Sigma 20-40mm or 10-20mm or 17-35mm which one is better to have?


John Jolbe
09-11-2007, 11:09 PM
Hi I'm planning to purchase one of those, But I'm still confused of the Specs and capability of three lenses. Kindly Please send me your Feedback/Comments in regards of this lenses.

1-Sigma 20-40mm F2.8 EX DG ASPHERICAL >>>>>>>>>(720$)

2-Sigma 17-35mm F2.8-4 EX DG ASPHERICAL HSM >>>>>(700$)

3-Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>(730$)

Thank you in advanced...:):):)

Keep on Shooting!
Cheers!
JiOn:)

ryanhayudini
09-13-2007, 09:01 AM
If you are looking for a wide angle lens then go for the Sigma 10-20

The 17-35 overlaps w/ your kit lens and is only 1mm better

The Sigma 20-40 being 2.8 is a faster lens and would be great in lowlight

allencortez
09-13-2007, 02:14 PM
Jong....depends on what you are more inclined to shoot. Wides are very good for landscapes so my preference leans on the 10-20. And I also agree with Ryan...you have the kit naman for your walk-around.

John Jolbe
09-13-2007, 02:24 PM
Ryan & Allen... Thank you for your response.. talagang nalilito na ako talaga..
HEheeheh...:Grin: salamat ulit! I think my problem is solve.. 10-20mm na lang nga!

Thanks a lot!
Cheers!

allencortez
09-13-2007, 03:55 PM
glad to be of help