hi. i'm considering to buy this lens. could anyone give me any info or personal review and feedbacks about it? thanks. :)

I haven't got much firsthand experience on this lens so can't give you any opinions. If you haven't seen it yourself though, and if you are conscious about the weight of your gear, I can tell you that it is one massive lens. Since it is built for full frame (film) it is bigger and heavier than the 17-55/2.8 DX. Not sure how it compares to the Nikon 28-70/2.8.

There's a page on photozone, but I think they might have tested a copy with the focusing issue, since they complained about softness at f/2.8: http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/reviews/sigma2470.htm

Also you probably already read it, but I should just point out our experiences with sample variation and focus issues with brand new copies. I seem to have read a lot of complaints especially for the Sigma 24-70/2.8. Here's a thread that I started on our experience: http://www.digitalphotographer.com.ph/forum/showthread.php?t=79

i hve this lens in my gear, one thing is great about this lens is sharpness...but the zoom ring is stiff and no HSM...very noisy while focusing.

cris how much ang lens na to? thanks?

i got this over the net...about $429 so i think its the same equivalent to pesos. napamahal lang ako konti dahil sa shipping.

i saw someone posting practically new one for about 20K in another forum though. :)

i'm facinated about this lens myself. 24mm seems a lot better than the usual 28mm and being able to close focus is a dream for me. I have an old tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 and while it's a lovely lens, i can't stand the fact that i have to be about 2 feet away from my subject all the time :)

hi chewy! do you mean your tokina of old? it's still there? :D that heavy bugger! :D

Dex

hey dex, it's still with me. built like a tank and probably as tough as one.

can't complain about what it cost me... hehehe. you know the story.

yeah! :D haha!

cris how much ang lens na to? thanks?

i think it's 25K at JT photoworld... 23K naman yata yun non-macro version...

I love this lens. Its my everyday lens. Great indoors and outdoors. Useless lang ang built-in flash at 24mm to around 30mm sa laki ng lens (82mm mm thread) especially on my Nikon d70s. Anyway, that is a good reason to buy an external flash :)

grrr.... 18-50mm f/2.8 or a 24-70mm f/2.8??

will you give up 6mm width to gain 20mm

i was thinking of updating my set to an 18-50mm f/2.8 + 60mm f/2.8 macro + 70-200mm f/2.8

or 10-20mm + 24-70mm f/2.8 macro + 70-200mm f/2.8

my personal choice would be the 24-70 over the 18-50
with your second set you will have covered all possibilities

since i already have the 24-70mm, im also going for your second choice.. 10-20mm, 24-70mm and 70-200mm as well. in a few days, im getting the 70-200. :)

Had one some years ago (non macro but DG version), but sold it because a) too soft at 2.8 for me, and b) slow to focus.

Sweet spot is F/5.6 to F/8. F/4 still a bit soft.

hey nesty (and all the other 24-70mm owners)

how do you find the focusing speed of your lens? is it fast enough to cover, say a basketball game? does it hunt a lot?

etc. etc... :)

I'd personally go for the first setup. The sigma 10-20 is good but not quite fast enough (f/4-5.6) for me, i don't like shooting with flash so much or at the very least just for fill and f/4 doesn't do it for me. I have a similar setup a D200 with a 17-55 f/2.8 and a D70 with a Tokina 12-24 f/4 and a Sigma 28-70 f/2.8 and a 80-200 f/2.8 on the side. The 28-70 is great for portraits but I find myself constantly needing a wider lens, it is easier to get closer than to walk backwards without getting hindered by obstacles (at least for event photography). It ends up being that the D70 uses the 12-24 more and the 28-70 becomes some sort of portrait lens, because it really is awesome for portraits. The compromise is obvious but a compromise that you do have to make nonetheless. For the 17-55, I find that it is in most circumstances wide enough to use for just about anything. Of course the Sigma is much slower in focusing but my D70 motor is the culprit for that. I do not feel that it hunts particularly more than my other AF-S lenses.

ts pasingit lang po:

i hve this lens in my gear, one thing is great about this lens is sharpness...but the zoom ring is stiff and no HSM...very noisy while focusing.are all sigma lenses slow in focusing? kase im also planning to get a 20mm.

what about the noise? what's the big deal po with the noise? will it scare the carterpillars and snails away? or the paparazzi dont like noisy lens?

hey nesty (and all the other 24-70mm owners)

how do you find the focusing speed of your lens? is it fast enough to cover, say a basketball game? does it hunt a lot?

etc. etc... :)


Chewy, I got the 24 to 70 2.8 nikkor. Really a great lens...fast yung focusing and super sharp mga pics...:D

for around 20K++, i think it is already a good lens. i have the macro version and my friend who has the canon 17-55 2.8 is usm is getting jealous over my close up nature shots. :)

so how much does an 82mm filter for this lens usually cost?

Chewy, I got the 24 to 70 2.8 nikkor. Really a great lens...fast yung focusing and super sharp mga pics...:D

The Nikon lens is 28-70mm f/2.8! :)

so how much does an 82mm filter for this lens usually cost?

JT Photoworld has it for Php2600.

the used copy i got is great so far. :D
tested for back/front focus crudely on a keyboard... hehehe. the focused letter was sharp. :D

I have an old tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 and while it's a lovely lens, i can't stand the fact that i have to be about 2 feet away from my subject all the time :)

Although it has the word "macro" in it's name, it's minimum focusing distance is still around a feet and a half so not much different than what you have now.

I have this lens in a Nikon AF mount and I love how sharp images are specially when stopped down a stop or two. Downside is the huge 82mm filter thread, so filters will cost a small fortune. Think of it this way, a wide-angle CPL (thinner element and ring) for this lens costs almost as much as a nikkor 50mm 1.8.

how do you find the focusing speed of your lens? is it fast enough to cover, say a basketball game? does it hunt a lot?

Focusing speed is adequate for my applications but might be a little slow focusing for sports, but then again, this lens might be on the short end for sporting events so I would probably use a 80-200mm.

i'm considering to get this lens

anybody here wanna share pictures shot using the sigma 24-70?

thanks

nice lens, wide opening..im considering to buy this in the future! excellent in low light!

i have some pictures using this lens pasensya na all snapshots lang po
try zooming in it thanks for looking

http://picasaweb.google.com/RitchiePerez/GriffithTrainMuseum

Thanks for sharing Ritchie, can i add you in my picasa? :D

No problem sir adrian id be happy to be in your contacts list

the used copy i got is great so far. :D
tested for back/front focus crudely on a keyboard... hehehe. the focused letter was sharp. :D sir is it sharp at 2.8 from 24 to 70?

for around 20K++, i think it is already a good lens. i have the macro version and my friend who has the canon 17-55 2.8 is usm is getting jealous over my close up nature shots. :) sir is this sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro sharp at f2.8 from 24 to 70.

Let me just give this thread a bump...

Here is my share of sample pics I took from last Saturday's Gawad Kalinga Event along Central Ave. QC.

These pics were taken by my Sigma 24-70 f/2.8.. In my humble opinion I think it is one very capable lens.:)



http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/neomaster888/DSC_0206Medium.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/neomaster888/DSC_0255Medium.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/neomaster888/DSC_0171Medium.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v212/neomaster888/DSC_0170Medium.jpg

Miggy: not sure if it's the PP, but focus seems a bit off with all the pics...

Miggy: not sure if it's the PP, but focus seems a bit off with all the pics...

Thanks for the feedback David.. What do you mean by the focus being a bit off? Can you please be specific so I'll know if it was my settings, or it was the PP that I did.

sir.... edited ba yung mga photos? @ miggydodina

I was a bit lucky because I was able to use both Sigma's 24-70 f/2.8 and it's counter part Tamron's 28-75 f/2.8. I used the sigma for more than a year and used it for events such as weddings and debuts, I find it very reliable in low lights and its so called macro capability, however, when I used the tamron I was surprised of its performance in terms of the faster focusing compared to sigma, no noise at all while focusing, the color and I find it sharper than the sigma. sigma @ 24mm f/2.8 is extremely soft. compared to tamron's. tho the sigma's macro is better than the tamron.

sir.... edited ba yung mga photos? @ miggydodina

yes sir.. the pics have already been PP'd.

i know someone who's selling this lens with a canon mount.. does this mean it can't work for the nikon d50?

canon mount for canon cam; nikon mount for nikon cam

canon mount for canon cam; nikon mount for nikon cam

hehe.. thanks for the clarification. taking a chance lang :D

i know someone who's selling this lens with a canon mount.. does this mean it can't work for the nikon d50?

ano yun ria, you want this lens also? this is what i have with me... though it doenst autofocus on my D40, i still love this lens. and yes, i have to agree that it is stiff sometimes. but it doesnt worries me, i am more worried of the MF. the only thing that i dont like is that sensor doesnt work when in MF, so i have to second guess my shot, if it is blurred, then "sorry na lang" (try again) if not, then asteg!

anyway, i love this lens, but i want autofocus...soo i guess it is time to buy D80...ahaha asteeg

why are the pics that soft and lacking in sharpness? did you do that during pp?

Thanks for the feedback David.. What do you mean by the focus being a bit off? Can you please be specific so I'll know if it was my settings, or it was the PP that I did.

I'd like to share my experiences with my Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG MACRO.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/202/473667715_733a4e9c38.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/134/411669076_0819fa17db.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/188/401494789_f89b2c0dfc.jpg

I used mine for a few months in events and shoots and apart from it being a bit big (especially at 24mm) and heavy, I liked it's sharpness and warmth. It is very comparable to the its L counterpart and the price is half the Canon counterpart even on sale. Like any third party lens, make sure you test the hell out of it before purchase. Before picking my copy, I tested another for 20 minutes and it was a lemon! Usual problems include focus-hunting, maybe some back focusing problems and unusual CA around the edges.

I'm not using mine anymore so if anyone of you are interested to purchase just message me. I took care of my lens like it was my own baby.

The Nikon lens is 28-70mm f/2.8! :)

Nikon has its 24-70 F2.8 now :)

Does anybody know how much is this lens nowadays?

costs around 22,500 at JT photo. cheaper than before which is 24,800 pesos...but the sigma 82mm ex uv filter costs a whooping 2,400 pesos. You can also wait for photoworld 2008 and expect a 5-10 percent discount. :)

Are there other hood options for this lens? Maybe something bigger? Alot of users seem to be complaining of its useless design.

The Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, on the other hand, makes use of a BIG hood.

Bought this one at the Photoworld exhibit at the Glorietta last Feb for 25K. Opted for this one since Canon's price was more than twice. Canon's faster becuse of the USM. This one has no HSM but it works great with my 5D. Did a few shots with a model in the 8th Int. Cebu Motorshow posted at www.flickr.com\photos\eil

this is nice lense but not fast focus and heavy.. i got 2nd hand of this for only 13k. it seems soft in f/2.8 maybe because of the macro?

i just bought mines Brand new...itesting it was all fine but after buying it...i did for a test shoot outside after half hour...the images were Soft, lacking contrast...i need to stop at 5.6 to get sharper images without blowing up the whole image......Will retun it tomorrow..

Well Got the Exchange and now i have the TACK SHARP Copy which will be my Walkaround lens....It is quite heavy & Buky....to help my Arm workouts,..... Will post my Captures later after my Test Drive...

Well Got the Exchange and now i have the TACK SHARP Copy which will be my Walkaround lens....It is quite heavy & Buky....to help my Arm workouts,..... Will post my Captures later after my Test Drive...

Sir, is it the same Sigma 24-70?

Sir, is it the same Sigma 24-70?

Yes Allan it's Still Sigma 24-70mm but a different copy coz of the First ones problem...

here are some Sample shots i did yesterday.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2201/2308371940_a49e8f571b.jpg

few more
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2054/2308375180_5affa8c32a.jpg

you can also consider buying 2nd hand of this lens. dami din nagbebenta for about 15-16k n lng

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2061/2307555003_656d722be8.jpg

This shot is taken by my Wifey.

Brand new is Not really that expensive anyway.HK$2800 for a brand new lens. The Expensive part is the filter which cost HK$290 coz of the Size @ 82mm hehehehe...

Wishing for an HSM version of this lens *sigh*

Hi chris....bro are these straight from the cam? These are tack sharp.

How does this compare to the Sigma 24-60mm ƒ2.8 and the 28-70mm ƒ2.8? (besides the way cheaper filters for these two... 77mm and 67mm respectively...)

@Nat - you might be stuck with the 18-50 ƒ2.8 for now :Scared:

Hi chris....bro are these straight from the cam? These are tack sharp.


Yes just did some cropping & Taggin'...thats it....It's very sharp indeed..NO REGRETS!

nice lens sir chris! very sharp indeed. tfs.

yes absolutely sharp cause its daylight.. how if in low light..

I test this lens with my Canon Kit lens 18-55mm F4-5.6 IS. I set the f-stop to f/4 on same focal length at 35mm in low light with same shutter speed of 1/4.

Using Canon with IS was sharp but SIGMA 24-70mm EX DG was a bit blurred. Setting the F-stop to f2.8 would help to increase the shutter speed but it still blurred in some part of the image. OS version of this would be nice in situation like that. :)

Sharpness, with the Sigma 24-70 EX DG Macro is (for me) not an issue with low light situations. More of a focusing issue though, it tends to hunt.

Another issue is that it flares seriously at 2.8

For some reason, this lens is tack sharp on my 400D and somewhat off in my 40D.

just curious, how does this compare with the tamron 17-50mm 2.8?

I have one and am slowly leaning into selling it for this one.

yes absolutely sharp cause its daylight.. how if in low light..

I test this lens with my Canon Kit lens 18-55mm F4-5.6 IS. I set the f-stop to f/4 on same focal length at 35mm in low light with same shutter speed of 1/4.

Using Canon with IS was sharp but SIGMA 24-70mm EX DG was a bit blurred. Setting the F-stop to f2.8 would help to increase the shutter speed but it still blurred in some part of the image. OS version of this would be nice in situation like that. :)

I agree with OS would better...Same as Cedric it Hunts on AF but i normally focus manually.

The sigma 24-70 lens is a very good lens overall, its very sharp and it produces excellent images, that is if you get a good copy of it. The old copy of this lens tend to have focusing problems though if you buy your copy now it's only a small chance you would get a unit with focusing problems. But off course if you get a bad copy of this lens you can always send it back to sigma for repair.

In low light it does perfrom pretty well also but some times AF tends to hunt.

I got my 24-70 from amazon for around 390USD but some how the price went up again to around 430USD.

So for the price and overall performance this lens is still a very good buy and highly recommended. (filter and polarizer is expensive though at 82mm)
Hope they release a HSM version of this lens. :Grin:

You need to double half press with it to correct the focusing, especially @ f/2.8-<5.6 with using the single center focus spot w/ the 400D....

they should release an HSM version of this lens

I'm still forcing myself not to buy this lens because there's no HSM . Is the focusing of this lens really bad?

for anyone using 24-70 f2.8 sigma does it get hard to turn the zoom ring around the 35mm down to 24mm area?

tried my friend's copy. the focusing isn't bad. not hard to use, turn the ring or anything. the quick clutch switch from AF to MF is pretty cool.

getting a lot of info from this thread...i am planning to buy the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG MACRO this week and have read in some reviews from other sites about its lens glare. they say that the hood is not big enough. would like to hear feedbacks from owners of this lens. thanks in advance !

That impression is often due to comparison to the lens hood of Canon's own 24-70 L f/2.8 which is quite huge.

@ florencio : but basing from your own experience with the sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 ? how does it handle the glare?

i have the same lens and sometimes lens flare is cause by the UV filter.. removing it will lessen but flare is still there.

@ florencio : but basing from your own experience with the sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 ? how does it handle the glare?

It's pretty much ok.

Thanks allan and florencio, but even with the flare on the lens, still no regrets buying the lens, i assume :)

I got it 2nd hand, sharp copy, w/ the 82mm Sigma EX UV filter too for just P13k .... I'm quite happy about it. :)

if the lens performs well, i don't think you should let flare stop you from enjoying it. you can always be creative by putting your hand or hat to block the source of light.

baka rin naman shooting with the sun in the frame kaya may flare, eh that would happen to pretty much any lens na rin

At 2.8, I think it handles flare poorly. The lens hood is simply too small for the 82mm front element. It even flares on white walls.

It can be coped with, however.

:)

Got my Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 last week, and am very happy with the lens. Printed out tim jackson's focus test chart and it was a great help in testing the unit. Saves you the time and hassle most especially when buying lenses abroad. Would like to share my 1st few shots.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3086/2457129032_7064ecac1d.jpg




http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2201/2457126606_b894481bb9.jpg

Hi Cristeen, How's the focusing of this lens? Does it hunt? Is it noisy? Can you give me some convincing test to buy this. :Grin:

what i like about this lens ....

* sturdy construction, built like a tank and i love the look of the huge glass (82mm) the EX finish is niiiice
* sharp lens! with warm colors and good contrast .
* focuses pretty fast, better than i expected. no problem with back focus and front focus. this lens is very reliable in low light conditions. it hunts just a bit and doesn't bother me.
* at 70mm and f2.8 it is soft but because of the macro ability (i have no issues with that) but @70mm f4.0 it is sharp and is sweet at f5.6 !
* very good IQ at 24-52mm all apertures - sharp !
* it is a little noisy but doesn't bother me at all since i'm not paying for an L lens :) very easy to live with for the price i'm paying. (17k with filter already brand new, from HK)
* don't do pro work, so for a hobbyist like myself, it is more than adequate.



26mm f5.0
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2156/2456336607_13d80782d5.jpg

Hi everyone,

I have this lens and i bought it from JT photoworld just a few weeks ago. I've read in this thread that there are some who own copies that are not sharp or has problems. How do i know if the copy that i got is a sharp one?:Scared: Sorry, noob lang po. I just want to make sure that my copy is okey. Kaso, i don't know how to evaluate it. Hope someone can help me. Thanks!

best regards,
Honey

Honey welcome to DPP! You can use this (http://www.focustestchart.com/focus10.pdf) method as mentioned above to check your lens.

Hello sirs! Care to post some more photographs shot from this lens!

Church interiors would be great!

Thanks!!!

Cheers!!!

Honey welcome to DPP! You can use this (http://www.focustestchart.com/focus10.pdf) method as mentioned above to check your lens.


Thanks a lot! I did the test and the copy that i have has no back or front focusing issues. It focuses where it should. Does this mean that the copy that i have is okey? What about the sharpness? Talaga bang medyo soft sya at 2.8? Mine is. Pero to my newbie eyes, sharp naman kuha ko at higher f stops.

for anyone using 24-70 f2.8 sigma does it get hard to turn the zoom ring around the 35mm down to 24mm area?

I noticed that resistance too, hard to turn the zoom ring from 35mm to 24mm. here's an explanation http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=97&sort=7&cat=37&page=1 (the third review). So the lens will hold itself at wide angle. The Tamron has a focus lock. I use it on my Pentax K200.

D200 + Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 w/ built in flash
Crop only
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y285/jerrickngo/others/_DSC0383.jpg

Here's mine with the same lens. So far I ma very happy with it except for some issues like the weight and the zoom ring which is TIGHT.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3187/2741346918_4eaeb1d875.jpg

Pardon for PP work

@Karlo: When did you get yours? My zoom ring is too tight also. The Sales Rep in the Store said that the zoom ring is one of the complaint because after a year or so they bring back the unit for repair to tighten it. So they said its ok just for now.

My take:
http://www.jamirdesign.com/photogallery/images/20080803184401_img_9972.jpg

:Grin::Grin::Grin:

so far so good, ive had several copies of this... but ive never encountered any bad copies at all... :)

Just acquired this glass today. I hope I have a decent copy. Waking up this thread too. :)

Just acquired this glass today. I hope I have a decent copy. Waking up this thread too. :)


Congrats on your new toy! :)

I love the feel of my 24-70mm. feels solid though a little bit heavy but the pictures it produces is relatively good.

very crisp and clear. I bought it at Mayer Photoshop in Hidalgo for only 20k. brand new.

only complaint is the zoom ring. medyo tight but the pictures are sharp specially at high f stops.

I highly recommend this lens.

hi guys!

i also have this lens, bought it from a forum member also, 3rd hand na ata. so it's kinda beat-up and old. here's a sample pic i took with it...

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3559/3285855781_fddf4fcc42.jpg

anyway, about the zoom ring being too tight, since i got mine pretty beat-up already, mine used to be kinda loose. to the point that when you point the camera lens facing down, the lens creeps, hehe. so, since it was also due for cleaning, i sent mine to a well known lens repairman, and got it back, very clean and the zoom ring... very tight, hehehe. maybe i think it's also because of the heavy glass elements at the front of the lens. i'm not so sure.

Hello Fellas!

I am looking into getting this Sigma 24-70mm EX DG f/2.8. There's already a new release of this lens with HSM but its too expensive for me. :Mad:

As I was reading all of the posts here, some are complaining on the flare/glare.

I would appreciate your recommendations for this lens. I will use it for Portrait.

Please help

I'm a newbie and hobbyist. Thanks in advance!

Congrats on your new toy! :)


Thanks TJ. This is very late but since I saw this thread I want to update you guys that it was a good copy. I've been using this more for events and I'm impressed! Takes my mind away from lusting the Nikkor version. Haha! But seriously, this glass can perform outstandingly. Cheers!

Hello Fellas!

I am looking into getting this Sigma 24-70mm EX DG f/2.8. There's already a new release of this lens with HSM but its too expensive for me. :Mad:

As I was reading all of the posts here, some are complaining on the flare/glare.

I would appreciate your recommendations for this lens. I will use it for Portrait.

Please help

I'm a newbie and hobbyist. Thanks in advance!



Hey Leio - Go for it! Just look for the nicest deal. You can acquire it at around 20 - 25K. Yes, the newest version is far more expensive. Portraits would be good but a bit washed out wide open (still tolerable for me). I found f4 to be sharp till f8. You can check my flickr for samples. Cheers!

Hi Leio!

Go for it!

If you can recall, I'm using this lens to all of my takes.

Expensive or not is not an issue as long as the output is concern.

:D:D:D

You can try my shots using Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG (w/o HSM) here:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sunnyphotography/

or other flickr members' photos here:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/86814846@N00/pool/

Hey Leio - Go for it! Just look for the nicest deal. You can acquire it at around 20 - 25K. Yes, the newest version is far more expensive. Portraits would be good but a bit washed out wide open (still tolerable for me). I found f4 to be sharp till f8. You can check my flickr for samples. Cheers!

Hi Sir Mark! :Grin:

Thanks very much for your inputs! A really great help! I also checked out your flckr account. Great shots! Thanks again! :Grin:

Hi Leio!

Go for it!

If you can recall, I'm using this lens to all of my takes.

Expensive or not is not an issue as long as the output is concern.

:D:D:D

Hi Fellow Jason!

How are you?!

Oh yes! With your recommendation, we will now get this Sigma 24-70mm EX DG f/2.8!

Thanks thanks!!! :Grin:

You can try my shots using Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG (w/o HSM) here:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sunnyphotography/

or other flickr members' photos here:

http://www.flickr.com/groups/86814846@N00/pool/

Hi Sir Sunny! :Grin:

Great shots! Thanks for the input and the great help!

just got this lens last Tuesday and i really haven't tested it out yet. maybe this weekend :)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3321/3413800918_4c18780d5b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3560/3412991041_661452539b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3646/3413803912_c1085e01ee.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3326/3413000665_8cd3653fa1.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3617/3413024103_142630e42f.jpg

http://rfcboy.multiply.com/photos/hi-res/16/1?xurl=http%3A%2F%2Frfcboy.multiply.com%2Fphotos%2 Falbum%2F16%2FChina_Great_Wall_Photos%231

http://rfcboy.multiply.com/photos/hi-res/16/3?xurl=http%3A%2F%2Frfcboy.multiply.com%2Fphotos%2 Falbum%2F16%2FChina_Great_Wall_Photos%233b

Great Wall photos last week in Beijing, China. Lens used: Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG macro.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3617/3413024103_142630e42f.jpg

Hi Andrew! Thanks for sharing! Great shots! :Grin:

http://rfcboy.multiply.com/photos/hi-res/16/3?xurl=http%3A%2F%2Frfcboy.multiply.com%2Fphotos%2 Falbum%2F16%2FChina_Great_Wall_Photos%233b

Great Wall photos last week in Beijing, China. Lens used: Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX DG macro.

Hi Pio!

Thanks for sharing! :Grin:

Hi Andrew! Thanks for sharing! Great shots! :Grin:

Thanks! :)

Hi Pio!

Thanks for sharing! :Grin:

Welcome. Happy shooting this Holy Week.http://www.digitalphotographer.com.ph/forum/images/icons/icon7.gifhttp://www.digitalphotographer.com.ph/forum/images/icons/icon12.gif

Hi there, I would like to contribute to the thread by posting some shots I made with my copy of the Sigma24-70f/2.8

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee25/sixtopakingjr/DSC03057.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee25/sixtopakingjr/DSC03078.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee25/sixtopakingjr/DSC03036.jpg

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee25/sixtopakingjr/DSC03085.jpg

:Grin:

this lens doesnt have inner focusing right?

I find my pictures in my 24-70mm a bit soft specially at f2.8, are you guys experiencing the same?

if so, any recommendations to solve this dilemma?

thanks

^ from what i've read on the reviews, sigma 24-70 DG macro should be sharper than canon 24-70 at all openings and focal points.

I find my pictures in my 24-70mm a bit soft specially at f2.8, are you guys experiencing the same?

if so, any recommendations to solve this dilemma?

thanks


your lens might need calibration, you can go to jtphoto after 4pm =)

Just got mine recently (I still feel 24 is not wide enough for me, but with the price I got it considering it's still new, why not?), but I have couple questions about this lens:
1. Is your copy a little bit soft at 70? I read that it's common in that length.
2. I find it hard to control the depth of field compared to other lens. Even at f/4 (most especially at 70mm), it's still a bit shallow.

Thanks!

About my inquiry above, I tested the lens using the front/back focus chart and found out that at 70mm it's front focus by at least 1cm or 1 battery away (using AA battery). At 24mm, it has a little bit back focus but tolerable :)

Just got mine recently (I still feel 24 is not wide enough for me, but with the price I got it considering it's still new, why not?), but I have couple questions about this lens:
1. Is your copy a little bit soft at 70? I read that it's common in that length.
2. I find it hard to control the depth of field compared to other lens. Even at f/4 (most especially at 70mm), it's still a bit shallow.

Thanks!


dof is also affected by focal length i think, lower aperture plus longer focal length and greater distance between subject and background or foreground affects dof, please correct me if im wrong =)

about your question on the other thread, i think you can have it calibrated at jt for 1200, but im not sure.

dof is also affected by focal length i think, lower aperture plus longer focal length and greater distance between subject and background or foreground affects dof, please correct me if im wrong =)

about your question on the other thread, i think you can have it calibrated at jt for 1200, but im not sure.

Yep, you're correct about it. But given those, I find it hard to control DOF compared to those I've used like kit lens, 17-85, 17-40L and 50 1.8. Even at f/4, dof is still shallow for this lens (my copy), and at f/8, other lenses are still deeper.

And yes, I've already brought it to JT, and the issue at 70mm was solved.:) The only thing that bothers me little is at 24mm, it had a little back focus after the calibration.

I just got a copy of this lens for myself. :)

As suggested I took all the necessary precautions and tested multiple copies of this lens over at JT before purchasing.

This is my first Sigma lens and im coming from using purely canon lenses, both L and standard lenses.

General observations.
(This may just be with my copy?)

1. This lens seems to catch colors differently compared to my canon lenses. Specially indoor, there seems to be a slight yellow color cast.

2. My copy maintains preety good sharpness the entire focal length. I do see a difference compared to shooting with L lenses, definately not enough to warrant the additional 30-35k more to purchase it. (In my opinion at least). It does get a bit softer wide open and 70mm but really performs well f4 till about f11.

3. Its a preety heft lens. Not as big as the L equivalent, just slightly smaller. Its does give me a bit more confidence than the competing Tamron. its a bit heavy too, but i like my lenses that way. I do like the EX DG finish. Matte black.

4. The zoom ring turns opposite to the canon. (takes a while to get used to) Its also very tight to turn. ( I hear it loosens up after time).

5. The Petal type lens hood is tiny. It barely does its job in keeping flare away. I still have to cover up with my hands for additional prevention.

6. Clutch for AF to M takes some getting used to as well. I dont understand why I had to do an additional action to switch to manual, instead of just the AF- M switch I now have to use a clutch as well.

Conclusion:

I forget the minor nuances when I shoot with this lens. The image quality, the build and the price are definately worth raving about! I'd recommend this lens to anyone who wants a good walk around, and loves taking portraits. :)

qustion? i did not use star filter in this shot. bakit parang meron?
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y285/jerrickngo/DSC_6011.jpg

Hello leio!
It is a very good portrait lens and captures warm images compared to other lenses.

re you concern on the flare : Considering the 82mm diameter of this lens, it welcomes flare quite beautifully. especially if you do not attach the lens hood. I, for one am a fan of natural light photog. and am lovin' it.

Hello Fellas!

I am looking into getting this Sigma 24-70mm EX DG f/2.8. There's already a new release of this lens with HSM but its too expensive for me. :Mad:

As I was reading all of the posts here, some are complaining on the flare/glare.

I would appreciate your recommendations for this lens. I will use it for Portrait.

Please help

I'm a newbie and hobbyist. Thanks in advance!

Leio,

i'd say go for it ! just make sure you test the lenses carefully before the purchase. download the focus test chart http://www.dphotojournal.com/download-free-focus-test-chart/ , it is very helpful.

i'd like to share a few of my images with flare.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3063/3114416199_8d328bfe73_o.jpg




Hello Fellas!

I am looking into getting this Sigma 24-70mm EX DG f/2.8. There's already a new release of this lens with HSM but its too expensive for me. :Mad:

As I was reading all of the posts here, some are complaining on the flare/glare.

I would appreciate your recommendations for this lens. I will use it for Portrait.

Please help

I'm a newbie and hobbyist. Thanks in advance!

Leio,

i'd say go for it ! just make sure you test the lenses carefully before the purchase. download the focus test chart http://www.dphotojournal.com/download-free-focus-test-chart/ , it is very helpful.

i'd like to share a few of my images with flare.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3063/3114416199_8d328bfe73_o.jpg


Hello Fellow Cristeen!

I appreciate all of the helpful inputs you gave me... Thanks a lot!

I also checked your shots, they are all awesome! :Grin:

Hi Leio!

You're welcome. :)

Hello Fellow Cristeen!

I appreciate all of the helpful inputs you gave me... Thanks a lot!

I also checked your shots, they are all awesome! :Grin:

@ leiodungo : did you already get this lens? how is it with the 1000D?

Planning to get this one as well. I'm already 99% convinced but that 1% hesitation is still nagging at me. :)

@ leiodungo : did you already get this lens? how is it with the 1000D?

Planning to get this one as well. I'm already 99% convinced but that 1% hesitation is still nagging at me. :)


Hello Karen!

I didn't get this lens. I got the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8. This Tamron works great for me for its wideness at 17mm (but of course, lower than 17mm is still better. e.g. Canon 10-22mm,etc.) and 18mm-50mm for Portrait.

I also noticed that "some" Sigma lenses are susceptible to lens glare. Hope this helps. :Grin:

Leio, so what made you decide to forego this lens and go for the Tamron? Is it just the glare? :D Hehe.

If it helps, what I'm after is the 2.8 as I'll use it for sports/basketball photog. :Thinking:

Leio, so what made you decide to forego this lens and go for the Tamron? Is it just the glare? :D Hehe.

If it helps, what I'm after is the 2.8 as I'll use it for sports/basketball photog. :Thinking:

I opted for Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 for its wideness at 17mm (10-22mm of course is better) and the rest 18-50mm for Portrait.

I also read out some reviews that this Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 is a good buy.

If you are going for Sports/Basketball photog, my "personal opinion" is to get 70-200mm f/2.8 if you are using Canon. :Grin:

Im about to get this lens by tuesday next week. But until now, im choosing between the tamron, tokina and sigma versions. Yeah and also the 85mm f/1.8 nikkor. I hope to finally decide soon. My concerns are the glare and the softness and noise issues ive been hearing about the sigma.

Hello Karen!

I didn't get this lens. I got the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8. This Tamron works great for me for its wideness at 17mm (but of course, lower than 17mm is still better. e.g. Canon 10-22mm,etc.) and 18mm-50mm for Portrait.

I also noticed that "some" Sigma lenses are susceptible to lens glare. Hope this helps. :Grin:


Sorry OT:

Hi Leio, where did you bought your tamron lens? do you have any idea where can i send my tamron for repair here in the philippines. my tamron 11-18 UWA totally died (got it from Middle East and the shop told me they'll send it to japan for repair, and will charge me for the shipping cost. the worst customer service i've ever encountered!). i like tamron's IQ output, but its built is totally undependable (toyish!) unlike sigma, tokina and OEM lenses. i'll never buy a tamron lens again.

Sorry OT:

Hi Leio, where did you bought your tamron lens? do you have any idea where can i send my tamron for repair here in the philippines. my tamron 11-18 UWA totally died (got it from Middle East and the shop told me they'll send it to japan for repair, and will charge me for the shipping cost. the worst customer service i've ever encountered!). i like tamron's IQ output, but its built is totally undependable (toyish!) unlike sigma, tokina and OEM lenses. i'll never buy a tamron lens again.


Hello Bobet!

I'm sorry to hear that happened to your Tamron lens.

To be honest I don't think Tamron have its own repair center here in the Philippines. :(

I got my Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 from Digital Walker Greenbelt 5. They assured me that I have 1 year warranty. I'm just not sure if they accept Tamron lens repair that is not purchased from their store. :(:(:(

guys do you know any one selling this lens(2nd hand) there in manila? would you know how much it is selling? I'll be back in manila for a vacation next week hope I can find someone selling it. Thanks in advance

At 2.8, I think it handles flare poorly. The lens hood is simply too small for the 82mm front element. It even flares on white walls.

It can be coped with, however.

:)

Hi sir. I also have experienced flaring with the Sigma but I heard that it can be minimized more with Collapsible Lens Hoods 82mm since the Petal Lens Hood that is included is so small. Does any one have experience with these Collaspsible Lens Hoods in terms of flare control and vignetting? Thanks.

I also believe this is a great lens. Here are some shots.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2519/3698270696_f59b8a833d.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3546/3697460303_53aeb36d80.jpg

Cheers

Got this lens yesterday, haven't really tested it yet but yah the hood might really be an issue as you guys have said.

Aside from a collapsible lens hood, are you guys aware of any replacement hood that is bigger that might lessen the possibility of flares

Finally got mine today from JT... awesome lens!

Finally got mine today from JT... awesome lens!

Phil, Is it a problem that this lens doesnt have OS and HSM? I know the updated version costs about the same price as the Sigma 70-200mm.

Deciding between this lens and the 18-105 Nikkor as my all around lens. :Grin:

Phil, Is it a problem that this lens doesnt have OS and HSM? I know the updated version costs about the same price as the Sigma 70-200mm.

Deciding between this lens and the 18-105 Nikkor as my all around lens. :Grin:

It's a short lens... so I don't have any problem with it not having the OS.

I'm using a D90 with a built-in AF motor... so the HSM isn't an issue for me.

The 18-105mm Nikkor is also a great all-around lens... I have one myself, as this came as a kit lens for the D90.

If you really think you need the HSM feature, then go for the newer HSM version of the 24-70mm... a bit expensive, P43k at JT.

go the newer HSM version of the 24-70mm... a bit expensive, P43k at JT.

My wallet will bleed with that kind of price. hahahaha!!!

Finally got mine today from JT... awesome lens!


Hi PHIL.... were you able to get the HSM version???
please... could share some photos using your new lens???

I've already tried the 50~150 2.8 and I'm really impressed by the sharpness of SIGMA lenses... Considering of getting a 24~70 2.8 SIGMA (a Full Frame Lens) for my lens setup... :)

Thanks and warm regards...:)

Hi PHIL.... were you able to get the HSM version???
please... could share some photos using your new lens???

I've already tried the 50~150 2.8 and I'm really impressed by the sharpness of SIGMA lenses... Considering of getting a 24~70 2.8 SIGMA (a Full Frame Lens) for my lens setup... :)

Thanks and warm regards...:)

No, mine isn't the HSM version. Since I'm a D90 user, the HSM feature isn't really necessary... that's even what Orly of JT told me. For those using a dSLR without an AF motor, then the HSM feature would be necessary for most.

http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc34/triggerman02/marian75.jpg

No, mine isn't the HSM version. Since I'm a D90 user, the HSM feature isn't really necessary... that's even what Orly of JT told me. For those using a dSLR without an AF motor, then the HSM feature would be necessary for most.

http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc34/triggerman02/marian75.jpg

Is it better IQ-wise than the sigma 18-50 2.8?

Is it better IQ-wise than the sigma 18-50 2.8?

I really don't know... I've never tried the 18-50 yet. Maybe somebody in this forum could give you an answer to this.

I have the Sigma 24-70 2.8 DG HSM and I have tried the Sigma 18-50 2.8. For me its about the same IQ wise. I will try posting pics later for comparison.

I have the Sigma 24-70 2.8 DG HSM and I have tried the Sigma 18-50 2.8. For me its about the same IQ wise. I will try posting pics later for comparison.

Can you do that please? It would be very nice having IQ comparison between the 24-70 hsm vs 18-50 2.8...

I've heard that the IQ with the non HSM is not as sharp (soft) vs the HSM model...

would appreciate everyone's comments on this... thanks:)

No, mine isn't the HSM version. Since I'm a D90 user, the HSM feature isn't really necessary... that's even what Orly of JT told me. For those using a dSLR without an AF motor, then the HSM feature would be necessary for most.

http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc34/triggerman02/marian75.jpg


Thanks PHIL... Appreciate your reply on this :)

I really don't know... I've never tried the 18-50 yet. Maybe somebody in this forum could give you an answer to this.

I'm using the 18-50 2.8 DC HSM (got it at hidalgo for 22.5K last year) and i'm really happy with it. The 70mm reach is just a step forward away...so if the 18-50 2.8 and 24-70 2.8 are the same IQ wise (or if you can't tell the difference), why spend an extra 20thou?
:Scared::Scared::Scared:

Maybe it is 20 thousand more expensive because this lens is a DG (full frame)? :)

been using this lens for about 2 months now.. and at first i really don't like the colors of the pics straight out of the camera..had a hard time adjusting, its just now that i've started to learn to get the colors that i like.(after pp)

i can also say that it's really a bit soft and not that sharp wide open.. but looks very sharp at f5

some sample pics..

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2720/4037299850_4a0063048d.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2654/4034466447_acc8d75532.jpg


http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2595/4034428831_3ef7b57343.jpg

been using this lens for about 2 months now.. and at first i really don't like the colors of the pics straight out of the camera..had a hard time adjusting, its just now that i've started to learn to get the colors that i like.(after pp)

i can also say that it's really a bit soft and not that sharp wide open.. but looks very sharp at f5

some sample pics..

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2720/4037299850_4a0063048d.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2654/4034466447_acc8d75532.jpg


http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2595/4034428831_3ef7b57343.jpg

TFS... very nice Image Quality from your SIGMA lens

Does anyone know the going price for the canon version of this lens? Does it have HSM for the canon version?

guys, you've got any idea how to clean the sigma lens body?? mine got those whitish stuff around the zoom grips... thanks

guys, you've got any idea how to clean the sigma lens body?? mine got those whitish stuff around the zoom grips... thanks

I use Cyber-Clean for this purpose... works all the time.

http://www.dponline.com.ph/store/show.php5?id=585

cool, thanks phil.

Does this particular model AF on D40/x/60?

My friend is looking to buy one but the newest brochure does not indicate it has built in motor.

Does this particular model AF on D40/x/60?

My friend is looking to buy one but the newest brochure does not indicate it has built in motor.

No, it doesn't. You'll need to buy the HSM version for this to AF on the D40/40x/60/3K/5K. The HSM is a bit more expensive... P17.5k price difference.

Does anyone know where can I buy the 82mm Collapsible Lens Hoods for this lens??? And how much???

i am thinking on going with the sigma 24-70 2.8, but whats holding me back is my bad experience on the 28-300(nevermind the sound and stiff ring, the focusing is so slow..) that i sold it after a week 30% off.... how about this one does it focus fast?

i am thinking on going with the sigma 24-70 2.8, but whats holding me back is my bad experience on the 28-300(nevermind the sound and stiff ring, the focusing is so slow..) that i sold it after a week 30% off.... how about this one does it focus fast?

I think the focusing speed depends on your camera body's AF motor since it doesn't have it's own AF motor. It does focus fast on my D90.

Does anyone know where can I buy the 82mm Collapsible Lens Hoods for this lens??? And how much???


Check ebay... that's where I got mine.

thats what ive been wanting to hear...coz the price of the nikon counterpart of this lens is beyond my reach..tnx again sir..

Can you do that please? It would be very nice having IQ comparison between the 24-70 hsm vs 18-50 2.8...

I've heard that the IQ with the non HSM is not as sharp (soft) vs the HSM model...

would appreciate everyone's comments on this... thanks:)


I'm waiting for somebody to provide feedback about this.

I wasn't able to keep myself from buying this lens yesterday. A friend tagged me along to Hidalgo.

Anyway, the lens kinda feels stiff when I zoom in. Is the 24-70 really like this? I didn't bring my camera; I got the unit without having it tried to a Nikon body.

Thanks.

I wasn't able to keep myself from buying this lens yesterday. A friend tagged me along to Hidalgo.

Anyway, the lens kinda feels stiff when I zoom in. Is the 24-70 really like this? I didn't bring my camera; I got the unit without having it tried to a Nikon body.

Thanks.

Better check it thoroughly, Sigma's tend to have issues.

Anyway, the lens kinda feels stiff when I zoom in. Is the 24-70 really like this?

Yes, the sigma 24-70 really does have a stiff zoom ring.

Yes, the sigma 24-70 really does have a stiff zoom ring.


Thanks.

That's what most forums have mentioned as well. I initially thought I got myself a lemon. I guess I just have to adjust to it.

The build is sturdy. Others complain about the weight; it feels just right to me. Some forumers mentioned that it tends to hunt and can get a little soft at times; yes it struggles (just) a bit in extremely dark scenarios (like most lenses, even the primes) but "soft" is not something I'd use on its photos.

It's crisp and clear. The color and contrast are brilliant. I've been using my 50mm and my friend's 35mm a lot. I think I'll be using this a lot more.

how much is it now?

how much is it now?
25,500 pesos:)

tanx man.............................

I don't know if this has been mentioned in this thread. I'm just wondering about the this lens' sweet spot. At what range is it?

I just got one yesterday. , and so far i'm happy with it. A bit hard focusing in low light though but images are sharp.

post your shares please...

I just got one yesterday. , and so far i'm happy with it. A bit hard focusing in low light though but images are sharp.


I am also planning to get a lens like this coz I've heard a lot of good things about it(Focusing and IQ)

Please share more info about the lens based on your experience. :)

anybody here who knows if henry's selling this? If not, can mang ramon do installments? TIA!:Grin:

Guys, do you know how much is the rate for a 2nd hand unit here in the Philippines?

Relatively happy with this lens. I have not removed this from my Nikon body ever since I bought it. :)


Early evening photo in Bohol. :)


http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4020/4698815937_2864f02127.jpg

hello guys! got myself a copy of this lens today.. will check it tomorrow if there's any focusing issue.. but so far, so good! the built is good and i think the price it worth it..

I'm using the 18-50 2.8 DC HSM (got it at hidalgo for 22.5K last year) and i'm really happy with it. The 70mm reach is just a step forward away...so if the 18-50 2.8 and 24-70 2.8 are the same IQ wise (or if you can't tell the difference), why spend an extra 20thou?
the 20k difference is from the HSM variant of this 24-70 f/2.8 EX DG Macro. Yes, this one is also full frame (DG) whereas the 18-50 is not (DC).

I just purchased one at JTPhoto last saturday for 25,500 - 6 mos 0% interest (rather than buying it for 23.5k + markup + straight swipe at Hidalgo which if interest builds up, will tend to become more expensive). They don't have any stocks at that time so being a known customer of JT, they entrusted to lend me a Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 while I wait for their stocks to arrive. This 18-50 is one of their demo/display lenses and it definitely needs calibration! I can't use its f/2.8 as it is very soft! lol Good thing I don't have any shoots at the moment (But I need it by weekend! yay!)

i bought mine at robinsons cybergate.. 6 months installment roughly around 23+k.. there are some sellers selling this for about 15 to 16k.. rumors are true when it comes to quality control.. i returned mine the following day because there were some peelings inside the camera glass.. good thing the store accepts 3 days exchange.. got me a second copy and im pretty satisfied with it.. I love the size of the focus ring.. makes me want to use manual focusing more often.. i have no problems with focusing and IQ so far.. it focuses fast enough for me and the results are just what i expect.. 24mm is also wide enough for me as of the moment.. Dual focus system does not bother me at all because it makes this lens more interesting and less boring.. will try to post some photos soon.. overall very very satisfied with the lens.. it's worth the price.. =)

any idea how much is this Lens in Mayers Hidalgo? Im planning to get a copy of this but torn between buying a second hand unit or brand new. TIA!

any idea how much is this Lens in Mayers Hidalgo? Im planning to get a copy of this but torn between buying a second hand unit or brand new. TIA!
a clubmate of mine bought one about 1-2 months ago from Mayer's for 23.5k

a clubmate of mine bought one about 1-2 months ago from Mayer's for 23.5k

Thanks for the info sir Yohan... appreciate your response...

one more thing, would you recommend buying a second hand for this unit? I saw someone selling this for 17k in other site. Tnx

one more thing, would you recommend buying a second hand for this unit? I saw someone selling this for 17k in other site. Tnx
so long as there are no issues whatsoever. test all you can before making the purchase. if all is good, by all means go ahead. resale value of this lens (or brand for that matter) is really not that high compared to its mainstream branded ones.

just got my copy earlier from JT fresh from Sigma... hehe ^_^

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4084/4842427707_d54b532d91.jpg

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4105/4843039912_5cb8c66517.jpg

is there a Sigma 24-70 2.8 that would AF on a D3000?

is there a Sigma 24-70 2.8 that would AF on a D3000?

the HSM version, which costs around 40k in JT :)

Got mine for 38k with Mang Ramon :) the HSM version, which costs around 40k in JT :)

the HSM version, which costs around 40k in JT :)

Got mine for 38k with Mang Ramon :)

thanks sir yohan and sir jasper.. :) i think i need to save up na for that since its nikkor counterpart is much more expensive.. :)

Does this really works as a Macro Lens. Because I found some forums saying that not all macro lens are really macro lens. They recommend using the Nikkor 105mm micro. Has anyone used this for Macro Photography ?

nikkor 105mm is a dedicated macro lens which has 1:1 magnification while this sigma could have say 1:2 or 1:4 macro capability.

Does this really works as a Macro Lens. Because I found some forums saying that not all macro lens are really macro lens. They recommend using the Nikkor 105mm micro. Has anyone used this for Macro Photography ?

I find the 'macro' feature of this lens only as an advantage of being able to focus closer to the subject as opposed to other lenses (since I shoot portraits all the time). I never really thought of using this as a macro lens.

I find the 'macro' feature of this lens only as an advantage of being able to focus closer to the subject as opposed to other lenses (since I shoot portraits all the time). I never really thought of using this as a macro lens.

nikkor 105mm is a dedicated macro lens which has 1:1 magnification while this sigma could have say 1:2 or 1:4 macro capability.


Thanks Guys... That's what I needed to hear. :)

Thanks Guys... That's what I needed to hear. :)

naks i smell you'll gonna buy this piece of glass eh...:Grin:

naks i smell you'll gonna buy this piece of glass eh...:Grin:


I wanted to practice macro photography... i found a nikkor 105mm macro online for 30k and the Sigma 24-70mm for 22k. So I end up buying A Macro Extension tubes. :D:D:D

Just found out that my 24-70 needed +6 AF adjustment in my camera in spite of it being calibrated at JT when I bought it. :Thinking: That was the reason for all my shots being soft at 2.8.

hi guys! any one who can help me out here?..

originally i was planning on buying a nikkor 18-200 VRII lens as an upgrade from my kit lens.. but from my research i found out that a lens with a constant aperture is much better (i'm such a newbie)..

also, i found out that a lens with this kind of coverage would be great for fashion and portrait photography (i'm a hobbyist but i'm into those kind of photography)..

so.. i'm thinking of buying this one with the HSM on it..

can someone post some sample pictures of it and share your comments about this lens.. oh, i'd also like to know how much did it cost and where did you buy the lens.. thanks in advance..

i hope you guys can help me out :))

P.S. i don't have enough budget to buy the nikkro 24-70. so i'm looking for third party lenses :))
(and oh, my real name is chardmasongsong, i have contacted the mods regarding my name change unfortunately he has not replied yet.)

thank you!!


bro, maybe this might help a bit. http://vimeo.com/5009249

bro, maybe this might help a bit. http://vimeo.com/5009249

I think it's a bit confusing to include the HSM version here, because this thread is about the older non-HSM version.

hi sir ice! good day!..
tnx for your help!!... hhmm the IQ of the sigma compared to the nikon nd canon lenses are very much acceptable.. based on the tests.. also considering the price of the Sigma, i think you get what you pay for.. i'm really liking this lens more and more.. tnx for that!!!

by the way sir, do you have any idea how this lens sells here in the Phil and where?.. tnx much! :)

bro, you can check the seperate thread for the HSM version. http://www.digitalphotographer.com.ph/forum/showthread.php?t=17820&page=18&highlight=sigma+24-70

sample shot... (with minimal PP)

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4145/5070047169_ec8a381d3a_z.jpg

Camera Nikon D90
Exposure 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture f/2.8
Focal Length 40 mm
ISO Speed 400
Exposure Bias 0 EV
Flash No Flash

How does this lens actually compare to the tamron 28-75mm. (optically speaking) I am thinking of buying any of these two lenses. So far the reviews I've read (not here in DPP of course) goes in favor of the tamron in terms of sharpness. I also learned that due to the small size of its hood, it tends to produce terrible flare.

Here's the review... any thoughts?

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/Sigma-24-70mm-f-2.8-EX-DG-Lens-Review.aspx

sample shot... (with minimal PP)

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4145/5070047169_ec8a381d3a_z.jpg

Camera Nikon D90
Exposure 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture f/2.8
Focal Length 40 mm
ISO Speed 400
Exposure Bias 0 EV
Flash No Flash

With "minimal pp" does it mean you sharpened the photo?

With "minimal pp" does it mean you sharpened the photo?
a bit of USM, yes. and some other global adjustment necessary. :)

Just found out that my 24-70 needed +6 AF adjustment in my camera in spite of it being calibrated at JT when I bought it. :Thinking: That was the reason for all my shots being soft at 2.8.

I thought calibration will fix the softness issue of this lens. It will shoot at f2.8 alright but the sharpness is incomparable to my nifty. I'm having a second thought on this lens which I already reserved @ JT

I thought calibration will fix the softness issue of this lens. It will shoot at f2.8 alright but the sharpness is incomparable to my nifty. I'm having a second thought on this lens which I already reserved @ JT
I'd say the 50mm f1.8II plastic fantastic is really sharper than the sigma 24-70 but then again that's a prime. I think the sigma is sharp enough IF it focuses properly with your camera body. I don't have mine any more, but I found it sharp enough with my 400D even at f2.8.

Here's a sample shot wide open at f2.8 and at 30mm:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3605/3455101927_9229ab63bb.jpg

is this sigma's counterpart to canon's L lens? or is it the other IF one? sorry for being clueless.

Hello!

Does anyone know where this lens is available? I saw in the earlier posts that JTPhotworld had this but I called a few mins ago and they said that they don't have stock and that they're not sure when they will restock this.

Or is anyone selling this lens? :)

Thanks in advance for any help!

I sold mine coz of the softness of the photos taken by this lens. Then I tried Tamron 28-75 and happy with it compare to sigma. Many reviews shows that Tamron is better in terms of sharpness of the photos taken compare to this lens. But for me, Im happy now in my the Tamron 17-50 sharpest among the 3rd party lens yet not same focal length of 28-75 and this lens.

happy with it, fast and sharpest at f4 and up :)

Just got mine calibrated @ JTPhoto the other day. Now way better! So happy with this lens! :)

how much for lens calibration @ jtphoto?

how much for lens calibration @ jtphoto?

mine was free because i bought the lens from them, and that it is still under warranty. i think it's 1,200 if not bought from them.

:)

how long will they take it to calibrate the lens? i think 1.2k is justifiable :) thanks sir yohan!

Calibration takes a few minutes but call ahead and set an appoinment. Usually its late afternoon. Bring your cam body.

Yep, do call ahead for appointment. For me, I had to leave mine and just came back for it the following day due to my schedule restrictions. That's fine with them.

thanks sirs! :)

Has anyone have had any experience with this lens with the D7000? I've been reading through some international forums that the 24-70 had some issues with the D7000 (when using the lens the camera doesn't even power up). I can't seem to figure out whether its this version or the HSM version that acts up on the D7k. They all say its the 82mm (filter thread) version and both the macro and HSM version have 82mm filter threads. I understand that the D7k's Live View AF has some issues with 3rd party lens but its not a big deal for me. I ask this question because I do have this lens (on my D80) and plan to upgrade to the D7k (or D300s) before coming back to Manila for a vacation this April.

Has anyone have had any experience with this lens with the D7000? I've been reading through some international forums that the 24-70 had some issues with the D7000 (when using the lens the camera doesn't even power up). I can't seem to figure out whether its this version or the HSM version that acts up on the D7k. They all say its the 82mm (filter thread) version and both the macro and HSM version have 82mm filter threads. I understand that the D7k's Live View AF has some issues with 3rd party lens but its not a big deal for me. I ask this question because I do have this lens (on my D80) and plan to upgrade to the D7k (or D300s) before coming back to Manila for a vacation this April.
hmm... now that you mention it, I'll test my Sigma 24-70 to a friend's D7000 and see what will happen. I'll let you know soon.

;)

Hi what will happen if you calibrate the lens?

Hi what will happen if you calibrate the lens?

When I had mine calibrated, I noticed that it focuses much faster and more accurately, it hunts better even when I'm focusing on a poorly lit subject, and sharpness has improved as well ---all at f/2.8, because for f/4 and above i don't have any issues before i had it calibrated.

Evidently this one has PP already, but it was only more on global adjustments. There's little bit of USM but I won't be able to achieve that if the sharpness isn't good to begin with...

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5292/5466873825_cd9ba8a45c_z.jpg

When I had mine calibrated, I noticed that it focuses much faster and more accurately, it hunts better even when I'm focusing on a poorly lit subject, and sharpness has improved as well ---all at f/2.8, because for f/4 and above i don't have any issues before i had it calibrated.

Evidently this one has PP already, but it was only more on global adjustments. There's little bit of USM but I won't be able to achieve that if the sharpness isn't good to begin with...

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5292/5466873825_cd9ba8a45c_z.jpg

ahh i see thank you sir,maybe i'll have mine soon haha thx

@ yohandelacruz

can you please post the non-pp of your photo
i'd like to see straight from the cam, produce by this lens..
if it's possible sir
tia:)

@ yohandelacruz

can you please post the non-pp of your photo
i'd like to see straight from the cam, produce by this lens..
if it's possible sir
tia:)

As per your request, here... (I just added a sig if you dont mind)

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5101/5581334581_aabe1b9377_z.jpg

As per your request, here... (I just added a sig if you dont mind)

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5101/5581334581_aabe1b9377_z.jpg

thanks yohann, how do you find it's weight
i heard it's quite heavy

thanks yohann, how do you find it's weight
i heard it's quite heavy
yeah, it is heavy. much like the nikkor beast 28-70 f/2.8

hmm... now that you mention it, I'll test my Sigma 24-70 to a friend's D7000 and see what will happen. I'll let you know soon.

;)

hi sir... what happen with your test here? because I just got my D7k and Im also planning to own one of this sigma glass, particularly this one. :Scared:

hi sir... what happen with your test here? because I just got my D7k and Im also planning to own one of this sigma glass, particularly this one. :Scared:
oops sorry... i haven't had the time to meet up with this friend of mine lately... but he did say that one time we were on a shoot, he used this lens of mine when I borrowed his other lens (can't recall, sign of aging? lol) and he said that he didn't find any issue with it.

cant find it anywhere here..
Is the IQ of the old version, Sigma 24-70 2.8 Macro BETTER than the new version Sigma 24-70 2.8 HSM, I understand that it is faster since the use of the HSM but how does it compare to their IQ?
Thanks guys:)

just got my siggy a couple of days ago..heres my share

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5068/5616030474_4f14210974_z.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5101/5616102342_4c67b2bb5b_z.jpg

I haven't tried this one out. But would you want to consider the Tamron 28-75 mm f/2.8
It's only about 18k in Glorietta 5 in Henry's. I heard it's really sharp. Razor-sharp for exaggeration :P

guys,

is the macro/ close focusing ability of the lens usable at all FL range?
is this 1:1 macro btw?

thank you

guys,

is the macro/ close focusing ability of the lens usable at all FL range?
is this 1:1 macro btw?

thank you
I don't think it's 1:1 though. I'm just able to take advantage of its macro feature because i can focus closer to the subject but not really for macro shots so to speak. I think it's usable throughout the entire focal length.

05-11-2011

FWIW:
"With a minimum focusing distance of 15.7" (40 cm), the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Lens has a maximum magnification of .26x. This is enough magnification for Sigma to give this lens a "macro" designation. I prefer the macro definition to start at 1.0x (1:1), but this is a good spec for this lens. It will focus close enough for nice pictures of flowers and other similar-sized objects. "

Source: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-24-70mm-F-2.8-EX-DG-Lens-Review.aspx

IMHO, this lens is not a true 'macro'. That "maximum magnification of .26x" is just a bit greater than a 1:4 magnification ratio.

BTW, true 'macro' lenses are 'primes', not 'zooms'; magnification starts at 1.0X (1:1).

Just my 2¢.

benrose

yep, this isn't really a 'macro' lens. as quoted, it was technically categorized as a macro lens because of its minimum focusing distance capability as opposed to some zoom lens. Sigma tries to take a bit of advantage with that feature comparing to their Nikkor/Canon counterparts.

one of the lens i wish to have...

The 24-70L has a greater magnification @ 0.29x, even greater is the kit lens @ 0.34x.

A lot of people fall for the "MACRO" label, good marketing by Sigma. :Grin:

where can we buy 2nd hand lens like this one? Sigma 24-70 f2.8 without the HSM?

got the lens now and love it... sharpness? not really that compare to tamron but focusing is awesome...

got the lens now and love it... sharpness? not really that compare to tamron but focusing is awesome...


Where have you purchased your lens? And how much?

Ordered it from Japan for 23k

Help, where can i buy this lens? Sigma website says discontinued product already! Thanks!

Help, where can i buy this lens? Sigma website says discontinued product already! Thanks!
contact JTPhotoworld @ www.dponline.com.ph

what do you recommend for a macro lense specially like sigma?thanks!