I have been waiting months for this lens to come out since its initial press release at around Feb. 2006. And now, it's available here in HK. :)

Kaso kulang pa funds ko :Shock: hehehe.. ipon ipon pa.

Retails at around 6,600.00 hkd. From a low of 6,300hkd to a high of 6,900hkd based on my last canvas with forumer Willy P.

Kelan kaya ito magiging available locally (Philippines)?

Hi,

I'm also waiting for this lens but funds would not be available until the last quarter of this year. A friend of mind told me the JTPhotoworld should have this lens here by next month. As for the price I still don't have any idea.

Regards,
Roy

Hi,

I'm also waiting for this lens but funds would not be available until the last quarter of this year. A friend of mind told me the JTPhotoworld should have this lens here by next month. As for the price I still don't have any idea.

Regards,
Roy

good luck roy! get one and break in natin yan :Grin:

Does this mean the non-macro version will be discontinued? Seems it'll be priced exactly like the non-macro version?

Or maybe this means reduced prices on the non-macro version? :Grin: That would test my resolve to buy only Nikkor lenses! :) It's such a great lens even compared to the Nikkor version!

A couple of shots I took with one I borrowed from a friend:

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6905/2522/320/DSC_5680.0.jpg


http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5479/1818/400/DSC_6539.jpg

hi gerry,

i dont think it will be discontinued. and even so, i think there is a lot more in the market for the non-macro version. the price difference here in hong kong is almost 1thou hkd for the non-macro versus the macro version. im hoping the macro version price will lower a bit in a few months time when more stores start offering them. even i had to control myself from buying the non-macro because based on reviews alone, good buy ang old version.

sensya na po for always referring to prices here in hk kasi i am based here. at least you guys back home have an idea how much the going prices are here.

it's selling for 50K now, and i read somewhere the JTPhotoworld has this on 0% monthly :)

Yes it's confirmed. :) JTPhoto have stocks of that lens at P 50,500.00 at 0% for 6 months using BPI or Equitable credit cards. :)

anyone here tried this lens already? i've read the reviews on the net but would like to get some first hand info from the those who have it and/or used it already. thinking of getting one since the L is too expensive.

thanks!

it's selling for 50K now, and i read somewhere the JTPhotoworld has this on 0% monthly :)

yup! it's actually 50,500 for 6 months or 12 months zero (0) %
interest for August 2006 only, and only for BPI or Equitable cards...

i have the older version, non-macro and non-dg and i haven't used it enough to determine if it's really a "great" lens.

hsm is pretty good though, but not as reliable as the AF-S in my 18-70 nikon lens.

this macro version should be better.

though sigma just came out with a 50-150mm f/2.8 DC lens. :)

& I have the Oldest :Grin: 70-210 f2.8 which would only do f3.0 on a D70/s but would go to f2.8 on a F100 or S2pro. this alone is fun to use what more yung latest iteration.

Some/ most of my shots using this Old Lens > http://www.digitalphotographer.com.ph/forum/showthread.php?t=732

those are good quality shots....did you have to post process or are they as is?

what's making me lean over this unit is really the price when compared to the canon 2.8 L version....later on i plan to add the 2x teleconverter and it costs 10t for the sigma model. so lens plus teleconverter would be 60t...on the other hand the canon is 68t plus around 18t for the teleconverter....haaayy......decisions in life :-(

thanks for looking, just the usual LCS (Levels,curves, sharpen) in PS & a few blurs with those ladies :Grin:

even with a cheap Kenko 2X ET the qa seems to be OK but that's on broad :) daylight

those are good quality shots....did you have to post process or are they as is?

what's making me lean over this unit is really the price when compared to the canon 2.8 L version....later on i plan to add the 2x teleconverter and it costs 10t for the sigma model. so lens plus teleconverter would be 60t...on the other hand the canon is 68t plus around 18t for the teleconverter....haaayy......decisions in life :-(

i have the older version, non-macro and non-dg and i haven't used it enough to determine if it's really a "great" lens.

hsm is pretty good though, but not as reliable as the AF-S in my 18-70 nikon lens.

this macro version should be better.

though sigma just came out with a 50-150mm f/2.8 DC lens. :)

Yup that 50-150 is a very interesting and useful lens. I wonder how Sigma will price this one. They price their DC lenses almost, if not just as high as their FF lenses (example, the 18-50mm 2.8 EX DC is 26K, while the 24-70 2.8 EX DG is around 25K, i think). I really hope they get this lens right (design and pricing) and/or nikon and canon pick up on this idea and incorporate VR/IS on it. Just thinking out loud....

hi vince.

i saw the 50-150mm f/2.8 at bhphoto already and it costs about $670.
the 18-50 f/2.8 is priced lower na, i think. jan tan emailed me their latest pricelist and it's lower than 24K now.

going back to the 70-200mm f/2.8, I went thru all my flickr images and compiled them for everyone: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chewychua/sets/72157594245623799/

you'll find the images to be rather warm compared to my other nikkor shots, but it's not bad.

i like this one, because it's of my sweetie, just taken this afternoon at canyon woods. heheheh

http://static.flickr.com/93/221027235_702b3027d3_m.jpg
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chewychua/221027235/in/set-72157594245623799/

Is your lens the new version with macro? Thanks!

Hi Mark,

I think Chewy was referring to the non-macro version.

Cheers

Hi,

Just bought one last weekend at JT....performance looks promising... :D You will really need to test the lens since one of the copy I've tested has some front focusing problems.

I'll do some test and hopefully I could give some feedback on this lens.

Cheers,

Hi Roy,
Congratulations on your new lens. hehe Just curious, is it worth it to get this lens especially since the nikkor 80-200 f2.8 is priced below it (i bought mine for 43K, i think). How nice is its macro feature?

Hi Vince,

Did you buy the Nikkor brand new? Mura yata ung 43k. That is a good buy.

Hi Roy,

Hope you can post pics of your new lens. Congratulations.

Thanks,

Nesty

Hi,

Just bought one last weekend at JT....performance looks promising... :D You will really need to test the lens since one of the copy I've tested has some front focusing problems.

I'll do some test and hopefully I could give some feedback on this lens.

Cheers,

congratulations again roy.

i was able to test roy's new glass this afternoon.

pretty neat. super silent! and fast focusing.

definitely faster than my 80-200. :)

roy - if you like you can borrow my lens to compare the color, sharpness and contrast of the 2 glass:)

congrats again man! enjoy your new toy! =)

Hi Roy,
Congratulations on your new lens. hehe Just curious, is it worth it to get this lens especially since the nikkor 80-200 f2.8 is priced below it (i bought mine for 43K, i think). How nice is its macro feature?

Thanks Vince,

I bought this lens instead of the Nikon 80-200mm for 2 reasons.

1st is because of the HSM...I was so spoiled with the AFS of my kit lens so i decided I wanted a quiet lens...:)

2nd is the minimum focusing distance compared to other lenses of the same range. I don't know if this would qualify as a Macro lens since the ratio is only 1:3.4(not completely sure).

Right now the price of the nikon 80-200mm is equal if not higher than the new sigma.

For me its worth it to get this lens specially since JT gave a 12months 0%interest via BPI or Equitable Credit card.

Thanks again,
Roy

Hi Vince,

Did you buy the Nikkor brand new? Mura yata ung 43k. That is a good buy.

Hi Roy,

Hope you can post pics of your new lens. Congratulations.

Thanks,

Nesty

Thanks Nesty!!! :)

@Levi

Bosing...salamat sa pagpapahiram mo sa akin ng 80-200mm before I bought the Sigma...medyo mabibilis ung test subject ko kaya ung HSM ang naging kicker sa pagkuha ng lens na ito.

I'll try to post some pics pag nabigyan ko na ng full test itong lens na ito...:)

Hi Vince,

Did you buy the Nikkor brand new? Mura yata ung 43k. That is a good buy.

Hi Roy,

Hope you can post pics of your new lens. Congratulations.

Thanks,

Nesty

Yup brand new :) Got it last year at mayers

Hi,

Just some pics with this lens last weekend. My son Francis... (",)

@f2.8
http://www.photo.net.ph/albums/userpics/11644/normal_swim6.jpg
http://www.photo.net.ph/albums/userpics/11644/swim5.jpg

@f4.0
http://www.photo.net.ph/albums/userpics/11644/swim4.jpg
http://www.photo.net.ph/albums/userpics/11644/swim.jpg

just getting used to the weight of the lens...removing the tripod collar helped with the weight of the lens... (",)


Roy

I am also considering the Nikon 80-200 AFD. AFS sana if meron but its hard to find.

Just a few questions:

1. Is the noise of the 80-200 that loud that it could be a deal breaker?

2. More importantly, is the focusing of the Sigma a lot better than the Nikon. I read from kenrockwell that the AFD version is 80% as fast as the AFS version in focusing. My question is how much faster is the SIgma vs the AFD version?

Decisions... decisions...

@ john

if you're planning on buying the nikkor glass get the AFD or the VR.

Aside from the difficulty of getting the AFS version, its quite pricey (almost the same as the VR version).

i have the AFD version and tested Roy's new sigma 70-200... here's my take on your questions.

1. yep, AFD is indeed noisy if you compare it to the new sigma. is it a deal breaker? it depends on what you usually shoot. i do travel photography and i really dont mind the noise and "jerking" feel when the lens is focusing. whats bussing me is the weight of the lens! hehehe

2. based from personal experience, the new sigma focuses faster than my AFD. not sure though how much faster. the AFD is no slow (focusing) lens though..

.. good luck! :Grin:

@john

1. Between the Nikon AF-D and Sigma the Nikon version is a bit noisy(this is subject to personal preference) - The noise of the sigma is almost the same as my 18-70 kit lens...maybe my ears could be wrong :D

2. Just like Levi said the sigma focuses a lot faster than the Nikon AF-D, but the af speed of nikon af-d will differ with the bodies you use. It is a lot faster on the D2 bodies than the D70.

Optical quality would be the same (based on my personal experience). I went the Sigma way because of the HSM(AFS) and I also could not afford the AF-S / VR version of Nikon.

I suggest you try out the lenses so that you can easily decide which one to get.

Regards,
Roy :)

Thanks for the info. It's good to hear from someone who has handled both lenses. I have just come from testing a 80-200 AFD. In my opinion its not that far from my 28-70 f2.8 AFS in terms of focus speed (tested in in an office so lighting is not that bad but not great either).

Have you guys by any chance tried shooting sports with the lens? AF speed is one of the things I'm looking at. If the 80-200 AFD's speed is enough for me to shoot sports then I might just get this lens. By the way, I am planning to use this lens in school plays also.

john

I haven't tried shooting sports so I could not give you a definitive answer but if you want to try out the lens you can visit JTPhotoworld or if you are near philamlife tower(makati) I can bring the lens for you to check it out. Just let me know so I can bring the lens.

Regards,
Roy

Have you guys by any chance tried shooting sports with the lens? AF speed is one of the things I'm looking at.

John, I was able to shoot the AF3 race last Sunday using just one lens, the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8. You can check the photos at www.pbase.com/hochiabaya/af31 (http://www.pbase.com/hochiabaya/af31)

Minor PP using levels in some pictures. Some no adjustments at all.

Hope this helps.

Have you guys by any chance tried shooting sports with the lens? AF speed is one of the things I'm looking at. If the 80-200 AFD's speed is enough for me to shoot sports then I might just get this lens. By the way, I am planning to use this lens in school plays also.

Hi John,

In 2003 and 2004 I shot UAAP ballgames with this lens. AF speed is not slow but not as fast as Canon's USM. My most prized photo using this lens is a picture of Paolo Bugia and Doug Kramer blocking a driving Glen Manching (UST). If you wanna see the photo it's slide number 19 on my portfolio (URL below).

I'm a happy user as well.

Here is my recent pic using the 70-200.
http://myalteredego.com/photoblog/index.php?showimage=98

You can browse through the pics, the more recent photos were made using the same lens.

Thanks for the info. It's good to hear from someone who has handled both lenses. I have just come from testing a 80-200 AFD. In my opinion its not that far from my 28-70 f2.8 AFS in terms of focus speed (tested in in an office so lighting is not that bad but not great either).

Have you guys by any chance tried shooting sports with the lens? AF speed is one of the things I'm looking at. If the 80-200 AFD's speed is enough for me to shoot sports then I might just get this lens. By the way, I am planning to use this lens in school plays also.

John,

I own a Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 AFD and a Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 HSM. When it comes to fast focusing i would say the Sigma HSM is faster than the Nikon AFD. I sold my Nikon 80-200mm and stick with the Sigma 70-200 HSM.

I hope this helps.

Peace!

looks like this lens, both length and speed, is a pretty good one to have.

personally, i've recently decided to go after this one, instead of its more expensive canon L IS cousin. in my case, price is probably my main deciding factor, given that i probably won't get to use it that often as i would want to.

I'm a happy user as well.

Here is my recent pic using the 70-200.
http://myalteredego.com/photoblog/index.php?showimage=98

You can browse through the pics, the more recent photos were made using the same lens.

uy nakabili na! (bought already:))

Did not own a sigma but i do have the 80-200 f2.8 Nikon lens and it is the build of the lens that i went for. the sigma just does not cut it as a sturdy lens and the sigma that my friend used to own had its paint peeling off after a year or so...did not really appeal to me after that.

Did not own a sigma but i do have the 80-200 f2.8 Nikon lens and it is the build of the lens that i went for. the sigma just does not cut it as a sturdy lens and the sigma that my friend used to own had its paint peeling off after a year or so...did not really appeal to me after that.

so its more of a durability thing, rather than performance?

how often did your friend use his lens? it might've been just (more than) normal wear-n-tear.

Did not own a sigma but i do have the 80-200 f2.8 Nikon lens and it is the build of the lens that i went for. the sigma just does not cut it as a sturdy lens and the sigma that my friend used to own had its paint peeling off after a year or so...did not really appeal to me after that.

yeah. i have the 70-200 f2.8 non macro version though. after a year of use (not hardcore), i noticed some of the paint peeling off. but it's really more of a cosmetic defect. the lens, for me, still rocks! :Grin:

Same here, just got mine. exchanged it for my sigma 12-24 uwa. never been happier :D now to test drive the lens for a shoot. aesthetics wouldn't matter to me as long as the motor inside works :D oh and i have the macro version...

I've been using the non-macro version for 3 years... very well-built... fast focussing... stunning sharpness... well-saturated colors. The only thing I don't like is the strange bokeh textures it provides compared to my other fast fixed focal lenses.

now im confused.. guys, any price update regarding the following lenses?

1.Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8
2.Sigma 70-200 f/2.8
3.Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 --> a friend told me that you can get this baby for 75K. is this true?

now im confused.. guys, any price update regarding the following lenses?

1.Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8
2.Sigma 70-200 f/2.8
3.Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 --> a friend told me that you can get this baby for 75K. is this true?


1. this is around 44k in hidalgo
2. i believe its still at 50k
3. if you buy it from the states, yes. it's $1,549.95 from BHphoto. roughly PHP71,+++

its 50k at JT photoworld

i'm selling mine so anyone who is interested just PM me - i know that selling is not allowed here so please just PM, i won't resond to any questions posted on the thread....since DPP does not have a for sale section, I hope this would suffice

@al and hochi
thanks guys..

@all
show more reviews guys...next target ko to hehehe..

it's heavy, especially na hindi ka sanay. but, it's a gem :) it was even reviewed on DPP issue #7 and it got 90% :) nuff said :D get the lens already:D

it's heavy, especially na hindi ka sanay. but, it's a gem :) it was even reviewed on DPP issue #7 and it got 90% :) nuff said :D get the lens already:D

Wow congrats dude! Sige test mo nga yan, and post the samples so we can see. BTW, how much did you get the lens? From JT rin ba?

Wow congrats dude! Sige test mo nga yan, and post the samples so we can see. BTW, how much did you get the lens? From JT rin ba?

i got mine 2nd hand, from a friend here in Davao. he got his monster already so he was disposing the lens. traded my sigma 12-24mm for this then added cash.... the good part is gives sya so everybody happy :D hehehehehe i'll post some shots in a bit, it's in my flickr pa kasi :D

Here are some photos that i took using the lens, just did color enhancements and cropping using lightroom for the photos. :D

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1208/543152880_2647fb5ec3.jpg


http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1071/543152928_d5c67f8b02.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1049/543152872_5028fdc1cc.jpg

@spam
now im convinced!! hehe..TFS. please post more..

btw sir, any tips how to avoid lemon units?

@spam
now im convinced!! hehe..TFS. please post more..

btw sir, any tips how to avoid lemon units?

@aaron - fyi on the price of this lens, brand new units at JT is around 50k. haven't seen 2nd hand units being sold on the forums lately :) but definitely it's good glass :D the 2.8 works like a gem :D as for avoiding lemons, JT will allow you to test 2 units, get the better one :D i guess, naswertehan lang ako kasi my friend, took care of the lens. though merong aesthetic problems like, the paint peeling, but overall the lens is a beauty :D super sulit sya :D

i'll post pics later :) still have to upload them on my flickr :D

@spam

thanks..50K is ok(kayang abutin, hahaha)..before i was dreaming of Nikkor 70-200 f/2.8 VR for 75K....hmmm, ginising mo na ko eh:RedEye: ...hahahahaha :Dipon mode ulit...

@aaron - hehehehehehehe yeah, i also dream of a nikkor version, but reality bit me and i woke up from my deep slumber, that's why sigma na kinuha ko :D hehehehehe good luck dude, this is one lens worth the wait :D UWA na lang kulang, ayus na ako :D hehehehe

here's a few more photos

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1330/543152976_e11ca9f872.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1051/543152940_4e29a3ac8c.jpg

is this lens canon mount only? pwede sa 40x?

is this lens canon mount only? pwede sa 40x?

Hi Hubert,

Fortunately YES! Sigma's HSM (Hyper Sonic Motor) works perfectly with Nikon's D40/40x body. You may also want to try the Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 EX HSM DG Macro (a bit cheaper and not as heavy as the 70-200mm beast). I find the 50-150mm more of an all-around lens since I mostly do portrait shots. Having the Macro feature on both is a plus factor (allows a decent close-focussing distance).

Thanks for your reply Jose. I think only the 70-200 have the macro feature.

here's a few more photos

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1330/543152976_e11ca9f872.jpg

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1051/543152940_4e29a3ac8c.jpg


nice pics spam.. who's the girl? she looks like bianca araneta... hehehe...

i agree this is a very good lens.. my only gripe about is its weight.. but other than that it's a real gem.. best used with a monopod... :)

that is the reason y i settled for the 50-150 instead.. a much lighter alternative compared to the 70-200.

wats d update on ur 18-70? any new pics taken lately? :)

I tried it, and ended up getting the Canon 2.8 L IS....I have been a Sigma loyalist I have the 24-70 2.8, the 18-50 2.8 and I have the 150mm 2.8 Macro

The 70-200 2.8 EX DG HSM? SOFT. Get the Canon. Or the Nikkor. But that's just my view. To each his own.

I got myself one of these several months back, and here's what I think.

+ f/2.8 very much usable albeit a tad soft for poster prints (good for wildlife or low light)
+ very sharp stepped down to f/5.6
+ bokeh is fantastic! best I've seen in any lens so far
+ focuses as near as an arm's length away
+ HSM, so its relatively fast and quiet
+ costs half as much as its Nikon or Canon counterpart
+ compatible with Sigma teleconverters, and works great (I have a 2x)

- Its terribly unwieldy handheld (consider a monopod)
- minor corner light falloff at wide angle, although vignetting not that apparent
- performance at 200mm very dissapointing
- on a 1.5x crop, is too zoomed to be useful for portraiture (consider 50-150mm instead)

nice pics spam.. who's the girl? she looks like bianca araneta... hehehe...

i agree this is a very good lens.. my only gripe about is is it's weight.. but other than that it's a real gem.. best used with a monopod... :)

that is the reason y i settled for the 50-150 instead..

wats d update on ur 18-70? any new pics taken lately? :)

Ey migs, congrats on the 50-150 sir :) pm you pag nandyan ako sa manila, shoot tayo :) took pics already with the 18-70, will post later, i have a couple of pics posted on my flickr :) check it out dude :D

thanks spam! loving the 50-150.. saw ur flickr pics... nice landscape, waterscape pics.. like the stairway thing.. were they shot with the 18-70? did u do any pp?

yea.. pm me wen ur in town.. lets do some photo ops..

happy shooting! :)

yepz, execpt for the gumasa pic, it was taken with a sigma 12-24, the others were taken with the 18-70 :D pp done were color adjustments lang, then cropping, added contrast especially with the tranquility pic :D thanks for the visit sir, once i'm there, pm kita :D

Confusing!!! I'm planning to get either a 70-200 2.8 sigma but the 50-150 2.8 is also good at a cheaper price. The P50T for the 70-200 2.8 Sigma is still a bit too high. I haven't seen any used units here yet being sold.

I have a Tokina 28-80 2.8 for portraits so kinda leaning on a 70-200 2.8.

Love my Sigma 14mm (even if it hunts at times) so I have no problems w/ 3rd party lenses

get the 70-200 ryan :D no regrets here :D hehehehehe though the 50-150 is good as well, i love my 70-200. i tend to use it for portraits more than my 50mm 1.8, and i'm one happy kid :D hehehe

Spam - kinda expensive new now at P50T but w/ 10% discount its P45T. I'll just save up muna and wait for a good deal. In the US, 2nd hand would be around P30T in Adorama but can't test the lens there.

very good lens, i actually regret selling it for the canon equivalent (non IS) because of the macro capability of the sigma.

sharpness and overall quality, the model i got was very good

Spam - kinda expensive new now at P50T but w/ 10% discount its P45T. I'll just save up muna and wait for a good deal. In the US, 2nd hand would be around P30T in Adorama but can't test the lens there.

hmmmmmm yeah, well, it's worth the wait :D hehehehehe contemplating selling mine to get a nikkor, but held back because of the wait and the price of the nikkor counterpart :D stucked with it and i've been happy since :D just make sure that you get a good copy :D so that no regrets :D

Spam - If ever you do decide then let me know. Hehehe... The Nikkor 70-200vr is really a great lens. Its just too much for me.

I'll keep in mind also the Nikkor 80-200 afd just don't know if its still available locally.

ryan - hehehehe ditto :D hehehehehe you got pm :D hehehehe

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/sigma/sigma200.jpg
200mm

hmmmmm couldn't see the photo here in the office, i wonder why :D anyways, how was th JT visit ryan? :D did you try the telecon already?:D any news sir?:D

Spam - went there to get a 77mm Sigma UV filter for my Tokina ATX280 just like this

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/sigma/filter.jpg

but got this also in the process

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/sigma/sigmama.jpg

Now, my cam w/ this wont fit! What can accomodate this!!!

Sad to say, I wasn't able to test the telecon because some customer was complaining for such a stupid thing and I praise Joy (attendant) for handling it well.

Yet, I might get to try it tom. My Sigma 14mm has a problem, the focus ring - a tooth got busted. It makes a whining noise at times. Doesn't affect the performance but irritates me (HSM nga so SILENT dapat) so I had it fixed. I'll pick the lens up muna tom. since the part will arrive from Japan in a month pa!!! P2,800 for the repair. Yikes.

looks good in a D80.. how much is it? hhmm...

hmmmmm i still cant see the photos, i think our system's blocking flickr again.... anyways, tell me what you think about the telecon, will be getting one in a couple of weeks, surfing competition in siargao :D hehehehehe need to add length :D hehehehe

Jerome - its P47T at JT photoworld



http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/sigma/siggy1.jpg

any idea for this
Tamron 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II Macro


nikon d40x mount, meron na ba sa atin dto sa pinas nyan at how much kaya, its an all in one lens, macro to telephoto, wala ng alisan ng lente yan. any idea po..

benjie - sadly Tamron can't AF on a D40x only Nikkor AFS and Sigma HSM can.

ryan - congrats on the lens :D i finally saw you post hehehehehehehe congrats dude :D

Huwaw....Ryan congrats on the purchase...the lens looks pretty mean and intimidating :) Post more test shots.

@Spam...wow also a fellow D50 user. I'm glad there are still D50 shooters out there. :)

Spam & Allen - Thanks. I need to put some actuations into this lens

this is a great lens, as i mentioned in an earlier post i actually felt bad letting it go in favor of the Canon version (non IS), the only problem i had with the Sigma is flaking off of its EX finish...didin't affect the outcome but was just aesthetically annoying for me

I tested both the Sigmas 50-150 mm and the 70-200 mm handheld....dapat pala naka monopad. All my shots were blurry. I have shaky hands. I was spoiled by the VR. I hope Sigma will come out with an OS version of this

Gotta cure those shaky hands Doc hehehe :)

@Spam & Allen - I'm also a D50 user, I find no problems with it, I'll probably upgrade next year to another body but for the meantime it's just lenses for me, time to save.

@Spam - how's your Tokina 12-24mm? I'm planning of getting a UWA but still undecided on what to get, budget constraints. :)

@ryan - nice shots, any more samples from your new lens?

Diego - A monopad will really help on this lens hehehe... Gonna get one

Practicing also at 200 as I even got blurry pics when I had a 55-200vr at 200 but eventually learned hopefully on this also

@Doc Diego,

Ill probably get one if sigma will release an OS version of this lens:)

Red - Me too! Yet if they did, then it will cost the same w/ the Nikkor hehehe

@Ryan,

I hope not, hahaha:D

@allen and alex - yepz, loving my d50, haven't harnessed the full potential of my baby that's why i'm sticking to it. i'm planning to get another body by next year, and i'd still keep my d50 :D that's how sentimental i am heheheheeh

@alex - value for money, i got the tokina because of the constant wide opening of the lens at f4. loving it a lot, it's my walk around lens now, hasn't left my cam since i got it :D i love the distortion, i want a nikkor but i can't afford it :D next best thing would be the tokina, super sulit :D almost half the price of the nikkor :D

hmmmmmmm if this lens will have OS, this will be better. it's kinda heavy now, what more with OS? hehehehehehe but i still love this lens

ryan - how's the lens? enjoying it? :D

ot: are there any manfrotto monopods in jt now?:D

Ot: Spam, I think I saw some at Island photo in makati:)

hmmmmmmm if this lens will have OS, this will be better. it's kinda heavy now, what more with OS? hehehehehehe but i still love this lens

ryan - how's the lens? enjoying it? :D

ot: are there any manfrotto monopods in jt now?:D

@ spam

echoing red's post..just holler.. if you need anything here in manila bro..:)

@ spam

echoing red's post..just holler.. if you need anything here in manila bro..:)

ey taks :D thanks bro :D i might be there in a couple of weeks, then might be transferring there again :D heheheehehehhe

red - thanks bro :D will try to visit islang once i'm there :D

Ryan - Congrats on the lens!!! Time to shoot na!!! :D hehehe corregidor na to!!! :D

@Spam - let me know when you're here, we'll arrange a shoot for you :)

@Spam - let me know when you're here, we'll arrange a shoot for you :)

Thanks Bro :D will be doing that :D hehehehehehe here's to more shoots :)

ey taks :D thanks bro :D i might be there in a couple of weeks, then might be transferring there again :D heheheehehehhe

haha thats good to know...anyways just let us know man...we still owe you for taking us around davao :)

haha thats good to know...anyways just let us know man...we still owe you for taking us around davao :)

Thanks Taks, it was my pleasure bro :D no worries on that :D anytime when your in Davao, tell me lng :D oooopppsss OT na :D

[quote=ryanhayudini;243064]
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/sigma/sigmama.jpg
quote]


Think this'll fit a Lowepro SS200 AW with a D70s, 18-70, 50mm ƒ1.8 and an SB-800? It seems rather 'large' :Shock:

Thinkin if I should get one as well...

hmmmmmmmmmm possible, but i suggest get a bigger bag once you have this baby :D or if you want a smaller fast lens, get the sigma 50-150, that's another alternative :)

speaking of bags. Spam, what bag do you use for this lens? Can't fit in my crumpler and barely fits inside my tamrac.

congrats on your new gear spamjalandoni.. :D

ryan, hmmmmm i used my lowepro minitrekker before. now i use my pelican 1510 for all of my gears, the sigma is attached to my d50 once it's in the pelican. then when i shoot around, i usually put the lens in a lowepro lens case 4 attached to a lowepro toploader zoom :D when i'm lazy, i attach the lens to the body and use the toploader. with the hood in reverse :D with a toploader 75 or 70, the lens will fit snuggly. but i suggest, since you have other lenses, get a toploader zoom aw, then get a lowepro lc4 :D and other lens cases for the other lenses :D

worthwhile investment for the gears dude hehehehehehe easier to lug around if you use the lowepro system as well. i think tamrac does have lens cases as well, you can use that as well and attach it using the tamrac MAS system. either way, win win :D

kikoy - thanks bro, got the lens before pa. but thanks anyways :)

So if and when I finally buy this bugger I'll need to get filters, a new bag, maybe a monopod and new neckstrap as well (mine is somewhat worn)... the spending never stops! :D
Damn well worth it though...

So if and when I finally buy this bugger I'll need to get filters, a new bag, maybe a monopod and new neckstrap as well (mine is somewhat worn)... the spending never stops! :D
Damn well worth it though...

hehehehehehehe AMEN bro :D i suggest for the neckstrap, try getting a padded one, because the lens is quite heavy, it'll be a pain in the neck:)

JT doesn't have stocks at the moment so my purchase is put on hold for 2wks or so 'til the new ones arrive. Maybe God is telling me to get a Nikkor... :D

JT doesn't have stocks at the moment so my purchase is put on hold for 2wks or so 'til the new ones arrive. Maybe God is telling me to get a Nikkor... :D

Wow, that was fast. I guess they need to stock more for xmas :Grin:

Is this lens is the APO which i saw in JT's pricelist?? How much does this cost??

Wow, that was fast. I guess they need to stock more for xmas :Grin:

hehehehehhe with the price of this lens going down (thanks JT:D) some people would be tempted to get this when they're on a budget :D

i have a question though. i don't mind the peeling of the paint on the lens body, but can if be fixed? the lens that i have is in good working condition internally, meaning focusing and stuff, but the paint is really a pain in the eyes :D very tempting to peel it all off :D hehehehehehe

Spam - they told me that the warranty covers paint peeling (not worn out paint due to use) but will be diagnosed 1st if warrantable.

The parts that are peeling can be replaced. Ask for a quote at JT.

Spam - they told me that the warranty covers paint peeling (not worn out paint due to use) but will be diagnosed 1st if warrantable.

The parts that are peeling can be replaced. Ask for a quote at JT.

ryan - thanks for the info bro :D will do that once i'm settled back there :D like i said, the lens still rocks, but asthetics wise olats :D hehehehehee but haylabit pa rin :D

It really seems like a great lens. Really the only thing missing is VR... but I suppose that depends on your shooting style as well. Sports people won't really mind since I think higher shutter speeds are a priority and panning hardly uses VR anyway... Which incidentally is probably what I'll be using this for once I get it.

So we've heard the praising and waxing poetically about this lens... How about the downsides? Are there any quirks and niggles that you'd prefer not to have when using this? Any problems aside from peeling paint and the rare but oft-heard QA issues of SIGMA?

I just wanted to see the black-hat/devil's advocate side for this lens...

for the price there really is none

It really seems like a great lens. Really the only thing missing is VR... but I suppose that depends on your shooting style as well. Sports people won't really mind since I think higher shutter speeds are a priority and panning hardly uses VR anyway... Which incidentally is probably what I'll be using this for once I get it.

So we've heard the praising and waxing poetically about this lens... How about the downsides? Are there any quirks and niggles that you'd prefer not to have when using this? Any problems aside from peeling paint and the rare but oft-heard QA issues of SIGMA?

I just wanted to see the black-hat/devil's advocate side for this lens...

major downside of the lens is the weight, it's really hard to lug around your neck always especially if you use the unpadded neck straps that the manufacturers supply with the cam. another downside would be the paint chipping of the body. personally, i don't mind the paint chipping of, as long as the qa of the lens itself is ok :D

i agree with spam i must say that this is one heavy lens..

If you plan to have panning shots w/ this lens, get a monopod w/ a ball and socket head. P1,900 at JT for this type of monopod (if I remember correctly).

Downside? No OS. Hehehe... P30T more, you'll get the Nikkor 70-200 2.8 w/ VR (if you see it as you have saved P47T already and just a few thousand short for the vr)

i agree with spam i must say that this is one heavy lens..

for a 70-200mm at constant 2.8, you can't expect a light lens...it's the same weight as the canon 70-200 2.8...if you wan't something lighter then go for the canon 70-200 f4

for a 70-200mm at constant 2.8, you can't expect a light lens...it's the same weight as the canon 70-200 2.8...if you wan't something lighter then go for the canon 70-200 f4

I found out though that after using heavy lenses for a while, you eventually get used to the weight.:)

Jijo - because you get more muscles from using them hehehe

Finally bit the bullet and went to JT earlier today... :Grin:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2403/1771925605_5849defd35.jpg

Shame I can't play with it much yet. Maybe I'll take it with me when I vote on Monday...

Finally bit the bullet and went to JT earlier today... :Grin:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2403/1771925605_5849defd35.jpg

Shame I can't play with it much yet. Maybe I'll take it with me when I vote on Monday...

Congrats Randy on your new lens, how much did the biting of the bullet cost you? :Grin:

Finally bit the bullet and went to JT earlier today... :Grin:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2403/1771925605_5849defd35.jpg

Shame I can't play with it much yet. Maybe I'll take it with me when I vote on Monday...

Congratulations on your new lens... :) That's one nice piece of glass.. That was one of the lenses that I really wanted to get when I was looking for a telephoto lens.

Kindly share some pics once you've used it.

Randy,

Congrats on your new lens. You really agonized over this, as I read from the thread. I wish you good photos and memories on this lens.

I look forward to your posted shots!!!

Finally I got my 70-200mm f/2.8 !

Finally bit the bullet and went to JT earlier today... :Grin:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2403/1771925605_5849defd35.jpg

Shame I can't play with it much yet. Maybe I'll take it with me when I vote on Monday...

How much bro?

Finally bit the bullet and went to JT earlier today... :Grin:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2403/1771925605_5849defd35.jpg

Shame I can't play with it much yet. Maybe I'll take it with me when I vote on Monday...


hope you share your shots with us using your new lens.:)

Randy - Congrats to a now fellow Sigma 70-200 user. I guess JT got to replenish their stock again. I also got the Sigma UV filter for this but haven't gone back for the Velbron monopod for this. I too haven't used it much but whenever I do, I love it.

John - Congrats also for the glass.

Some shoots w/ high ISO on a D40x

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/D40/dog%20show/dog1.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/D40/dog%20show/dog4.jpg

The lens is P47T w/ 6mos. 0% option w/ some cards

Is the first pic not that sharp or its just my poor eyesight?

Rodel - The dog was running so the legs have motion blur and the focus was on the face. I guess I should learn to adjust my shutter speed but due to poor lighting I only had a few options.

For those asking, it's 47k at JT and they still honor the 6months 0% for major credit cards. I've been playing with it for the past few days and I'm loving it :Grin:

If you're on the fence about getting this lens then I suggest jumping off and going to JT ASAP! You'll be happy you did!

Disadvantages: I gotta go out and buy a new bag. My 6m$ Home can't take a D70 w/ kit, 50mm 1.8, this lens and an SB-600 in comfort... Maybe I'll get a Minitrekker or sumthing....

Thanks for the comments on this lens guys! It helped huge with the decision making :)

I love this lens... but i got the non macro version...

@randy - Get the mini trekker... swak na swak... =)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2118/1803481412_3c49c83fc0.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2239/1803481614_c9a8a8e7dd.jpg

Ok, now that I have this... time for a follow up question.

Anyone try pairing this up with the SIGMA TC 1.4 or TC 2.0? Seems like a good idea but don't know if it works in practice.

I have the 2.0, it works fine...tested it a few times with birds.... it multiplies everything including your widest.. ..actually planning on selling it since i am not using it that much..... the 200 zoom is enough for me for most of the shoots that I do HTH

Was thinking of indoor events like plays, stand-up comedies and concerts... sometimes it's great to get really close in and get the facial expressions. I'm wondering if ƒ5.6 is enough... or sacrifice range for the ƒ4 of the 1.4TC

Congrats Randy....borrow? hahaha Let's shoot sometime

i really wana test this lens first before deciding to get it hehe.. 47k is no joke..

Was thinking of indoor events like plays, stand-up comedies and concerts... sometimes it's great to get really close in and get the facial expressions. I'm wondering if ƒ5.6 is enough... or sacrifice range for the ƒ4 of the 1.4TC

With those apertures for indoor events you need a tripod to get sharp pictures unless the light is sufficient enough to get you a shutter speed that is quite over the focal range of your lens plus the teleconverter.

marvindungao's photos are phenomenal! ang ganda ng bokeh and the sharpness and contrast are simply astounding...but why does the macro version of this lens get a good bashing sa reviews, like at fredmiranda.com (the non-macro however is highly recommended there)? there are reports of misfocusing just out of the box, and you have to send it back to the shop for recalibration. is that the common experience with you guys? i'm really looking forward to buying a copy of this lens, unless its a ton of headaches before it works right...

Thanks Bambam....i also read from other forums that the non macro version was more favored over the macro version. I am not sure if this is true or not i haven't got the chance to try out the macro one, maybe Im just lucky that I was able to get a good copy..

Well, I went ahead and doggone did it. I was torn between this lens and the 50-150mm f/2.8, because for the same sharp IQ output of both Sigmas, the pros and cons were now squarely on price and weight, all to the advantage of the lighter, cheaper 50-150mm. But yesterday, I passed by Acel in Hidalgo and they were selling a 70-200mm store display model for the same price as a brand new50-150mm!...Well, not anymore, because its mounted on my cam as of today :Grin:

I never understood the weight issue, until I started carrying it around. Oo nga! you really have to know how to pace yourself with this lens or you'll soon find yourself with strained biceps and shoulders. But the output! wow!simply incredible. Tutoo nga sabi nila, when you see your images, the fatigue just melts away...thanks sir Marvin D for the inspiration. No wonder a lot of owners gave it good reviews around the Internet...

PS Hope to post some photos from this lens soon...

Congrats Bambam.... post some shots...

yeah about the weight issue its heavy.. every after a wedding I always feel a strain on my wrist, If you have a battery grip try to shoot sideways and mount the grip on your shoulders.. it will help a lot with the weight to avoid camera shake. Try to shoot more with that lens after some time you'll get use to the weight... just like carrying a 70-200 with a VR =)

Thanks! Thanks for that tip too. I was debating with the camera grip issue whether I should get one while I was in Hidalgo. I didn't because instictively I've always shot verticals with the same button, and is faster (for me) since you don't transfer/reposition your hand anymore. But you've pointed out the advantage of virtual VR (or in my case, IS)in getting a grip, so hmmm...but how do you mount in your shoulder, as you've mentioned? also, I have yet to shoot a wedding with this kind of weight, and I didn't realize your wrist will suffer too..yaiks! No weight training for that :Grin: I guess you're right, practice practice.

How about a monopod by the way? How does that affect your shooting of weddings?

nope.. i haven't tried to shoot with a monopod..kc with my kind of shooting.. usually events... it involves alot of walking and quick movement.. so i guess a monopod would not help me that much or in worst baka lalo lng ako mahirapan....

wel about the position of shooting ...its hard to describe but you will shoot side ways..and can only do that with horizontal shooting.... your shoulder will act as the monopod while you hold the camera normally in your right hand and adjust the s zoom with your left... sorry magulo ko mag describe..

Tried a close up (face almost filling the frame) using the 200mm at 2.8 and focused on the eyes

no PP except resize and border

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/doggy-1.jpg

Tested my Sigma 70-200 2.8 Macro HSM.

Tripod, around 5 feet away from subject, iso 200, aperature priority, wb=flouroscent and room lights (since its already the evening).

70mm

2.8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/70n2n8.jpg

4
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/70n4n0.jpg

5.6
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/70n5n6.jpg

8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/70n8n0.jpg

85mm

2.8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/85n2n8.jpg

4
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/85n4n0.jpg

5.6
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/85n5n6.jpg

8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/85n8n0.jpg

100mm

2.8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/100n2n8.jpg

4
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/100n4n0.jpg

5.6
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/100n5n6.jpg

8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/100n8n0.jpg

135mm

2.8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/135n2n8.jpg

4
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/135n4n0.jpg

5.6
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/135n5n6.jpg

8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/135n8n0.jpg

200mm

2.8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/200n2n8.jpg

4
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/200n4n0.jpg

5.6
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/200n5n6.jpg

8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/200n8n0.jpg


In the test, the focus area was specified on the chest area of the robot

Shots have no PP nor cropping just resize for web posting

Posted this for those deciding to get this. I hope someone w/ a 50-150 can test theirs also.

thanks for sharing. this is very helpful to those who want to buy or having second thoughts in buying this lens due to hearsay or what have you. Seem to be a great lens indeed for the price.

Outdoor (shade area w/ overcast weather) w/ tripod

iso=200, wb=shade and ev=-0.3

70mm

2.8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/out70n2n8.jpg

5.6
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/out70n5n6.jpg

85mm

2.8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/out85n2n8.jpg

5.6
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/out85n5n6.jpg

100mm

2.8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/out100n2n8.jpg

5.6
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/out100n5n6.jpg

135mm

2.8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/out135n2n8.jpg

5.6
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/out135n5n6.jpg

200mm

2.8
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/out200n2n8.jpg

5.6
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/out200n5n6.jpg

handheld shots (iso=400 all other settings are the same as prev)

200mm 2.8

Focus on big frog
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/hand200n2n8n1.jpg

Focus on cat's face
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/hand200n2n8n2.jpg

200mm 2.8 (wb adjusted to sunny)

Focus on dried up leaf
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/hand200n2n8n3.jpg

Focus on blue pot
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/70-200%20test/hand200n2n8n4.jpg

Have a shot similar to Ryan's with this lens... :Grin: was playing with it the day I got the lens and saw our cat hiding behind a wooden post...

200mm ƒ2.8, 1/60s
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2256/1802354299_fbf5b82464.jpg

Good job sir Ryan! This should help others who are waffling on whether to get this or not! It's a great lens and I'm really happy that I got it :Grin:

ryan. thanks for the shots=)

this is somehow helpful kahit resized hehe=)

im now exited for a nikkor 80-200 hehe

ryan. thanks for the shots=)

this is somehow helpful kahit resized hehe=)

im now exited for a nikkor 80-200 hehe

Hahaha... :Grin: That's a wonderful lens also I suggest you try it. Took this lens for its HSM (for my d40x) and I do love it.

I'm torn between this lens and the Nikkor 70-300 VR. :)

Emmanuel - I think this and the 70-300vr are two different animals. I feel that 300mm will be short for birding. My dream lens for that is the 50-500 Sigma. I missed a chance to own one. Sayang!!!

Ryan, you're right the 50-500 is great for birding and be able to close in on distant subjects but I'm concerned about its weight. At least for the Nikkor 70-300VR its holdable, the Sigma 70-200 is fast and able to shoot in low-light.

hi ryan. it'd be great if you'd post 100% crops to see sharpness differences in the different f-stops :)

Some pics at a concert at ATC

iso=400, 200mm at 2.8, shutter=1/100, cropped and no PP

Mojofly

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/D40/mojo1.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/D40/mojo2.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/D40/mojo3.jpg

If you need the range you can always get the Sigma TC 1.4 or 2.0. It'll bump up your aperture as well but a 280mm F4 is preferrable to a 300mm 5.6 i think...

diego - 200mm at 2.8 is a bit soft yet very useable (see my post on the sigma 70-200 2.8 thread) even when cropped. I'll try to do your request. It sharper at f/4.

This lens isn't the same as the 70-200vr but I feel that it is at the same level as the nikon 80-200 but took this lens for its HSM (faster focusing plus works on my D40x) as I have sold my D80.

If you need the range you can always get the Sigma TC 1.4 or 2.0. It'll bump up your aperture as well but a 280mm F4 is preferrable to a 300mm 5.6 i think...

I agree. Though I think the 1.4X TC is the way to go. Using a 2X TC is pushing it.

diego - 200mm at 2.8 is a bit soft yet very useable (see my post on the sigma 70-200 2.8 thread) even when cropped. I'll try to do your request. It sharper at f/4.

This lens isn't the same as the 70-200vr but I feel that it is at the same level as the nikon 80-200 but took this lens for its HSM (faster focusing plus works on my D40x) as I have sold my D80.

A bit OT here: You sold your D 80? Why? Normally,everybody is upgrading to a D 80 from a D 40. You took the road less travelled. BTW: any experienced with the APO Sigmas 50-150 mm f/2.8 HSM? Thanks:)

Looks like Ryan is planning to get the D300. :)

A bit OT here: You sold your D 80? Why? Normally,everybody is upgrading to a D 80 from a D 40. You took the road less travelled. BTW: any experienced with the APO Sigmas 50-150 mm f/2.8 HSM? Thanks:)

Diego - Just have plans :Grin: Also, some limitations of the D40x can be worked around to get the same quality as the D80 and I have no CLS plans so I won't miss the commander mode. I learned the differences when I both had them (had a D40 way back). I was told that the 50-150 is a sharp lens and great for portraits you can ask Alan Sevilla as he owned one and I think Miggy had one before. I didn't get that one because I wanted a reach of atleast 200.

Emmanuel - I wish!!! Hehehe... Lets see but lenses and a speedlight is a better option for a hobbyist like me. Or a D200 :D

Emmanuel - I wish!!! Hehehe... Lets see but lenses and a speedlight is a better option for a hobbyist like me. Or a D200 :D

Amen to that Ryan!

Diego - Just have plans :Grin: Also, some limitations of the D40x can be worked around to get the same quality as the D80 and I have no CLS plans so I won't miss the commander mode. I learned the differences when I both had them (had a D40 way back). I was told that the 50-150 is a sharp lens and great for portraits you can ask Alan Sevilla as he owned one and I think Miggy had one before. I didn't get that one because I wanted a reach of atleast 200.

Emmanuel - I wish!!! Hehehe... Lets see but lenses and a speedlight is a better option for a hobbyist like me. Or a D200 :D

Oh....ok thanks. Anyway the D40/40x can still be use in a CLS like mode. I did it, I used it with a falcon eyes IR trigger and an IR receptor and I can command and trigger 2-3 slave flash.....cheap pa. So I think the D 40/40x has no limitations (except the lens) U just have to work URself around it:)

a shot from a recent wedding I covered. @200mm f2.8 non macro version. Post processesed for Vignetting.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1295/1367128636_bdcc850130.jpg

Question on the Macro version guys... Is the tripod collar removable? I find it sort of a hindrance when hand-holding the lens. It intereferes with zooming since you have to move your hand everytime. Makes tracking some subjects pretty cumbersome. :Thinking:

the tripod collar is removable, you can even change the position if you want

LOL... it was just a tiny button like thingy... Removed the collar finally... much easier to use handheld now.

Oh, I got a canon +3 closeup filter and used it on this lens. Works like a true macro now! :Grin:

Some pics of my nephew

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/ravi/5mos1.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/ravi/5mos2.jpg

Randy - I just got to remove the tripod collor just now. Hehehe... Easier to zoom now but the mount neck is kinda akward looking :)

Some pics of my nephew

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/ravi/5mos1.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/ravi/5mos2.jpg

Randy - I just got to remove the tripod collor just now. Hehehe... Easier to zoom now but the mount neck is kinda akward looking :)

very nice captures. were these at 200mm?

95mm and 116mm respectively at 5.6 w/ bounced flash

Some pics of my nephew

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/ravi/5mos1.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/ravi/5mos2.jpg

Randy - I just got to remove the tripod collor just now. Hehehe... Easier to zoom now but the mount neck is kinda akward looking :)

Yeah, looks like something fell off the lens :Scared: But much easier to use now handheld with it off...

the mark II version was just announced, see dpreview :)

the mark II version was just announced, see dpreview :)

Just saw it nga. I think they improved the focusing distance and lens coating. I am guessing that it will be priced the same here. Anyway, I won't sell this unless I get my hands on a 70-200vr :Grin: since that will be a real upgrade but I would rather spend the money on a D300 (iso performance is the bomb!)

So there are 3 versions of this lens

1. 70-200 2.8 HSM
2. 20-200 2.8 Macro HSM
3. 70-200 2.8 Macro HSM MarkII

hi guys, just want to check is there a Sony Mount of this lens? :)

Just saw it nga. I think they improved the focusing distance and lens coating. I am guessing that it will be priced the same here. Anyway, I won't sell this unless I get my hands on a 70-200vr :Grin: since that will be a real upgrade but I would rather spend the money on a D300 (iso performance is the bomb!)


Was thinkin the same thing when I saw the DPReview thing... the only time I'll replace this is when I get the Nikkor 70-200 VR. Scrimping now to get enough cash to upgrade to a D300... that thing is a monster! :Dum:

Here's a recent experiment of mine with this lens and the Canon +3 closeup filter...

F8, 200mm, 1/350
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2231/2085923110_ca0fff815b.jpg

F9.5, 200mm, 1/125
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2224/2085923858_ff759540a2.jpg

I had dust on the sensor for these shots, only noticed after posting in flickr... :BlackEye: Cleaned with a rocket blower and now good as new... :Grin:

hi guys, just want to check is there a Sony Mount of this lens? :)

According to the SIGMA site, it's just Canon, Nikon and SIGMA mounts for both the newer version and the previous one.

Here's a link (http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3339&navigator=6):

sayang... really want to have this lens for my sony alpha... based on the tests and review, this is an impressive lens...

hmmmmmmmmmmmm the differences aren't that far away from the old version and the mark II. the focusing distance is a dream, if it's going to be less than a meter :D plus the extra coating and hopefully the paint won't chip off that much often, this lens will be a great addition to anyone's arsenal :D

70-200 2.8 macro shot

PP (auto levels, cropped and resized)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/ruter%20wedding/bridegroom2.jpg

PP (levels and resized)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/ruter%20wedding/004.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/santa/santa3.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/santa/gold2.jpg

Nice pics ryan... seems you are really enjoying the lens...

Looks like this lens and the D200 is a good combo.

It's pretty good with a D70 and a D40 as well! Shooting a wedding this weekend with this combo... :Grin:

Other pics

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/santa/pood3.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/santa/santa9.jpg

here w/ my old d40x

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/meg/fern3.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/meg/fern8.jpg

Just got myself the non-macro version second-hand. I did a few tests, and it showed front focusing problems at 200mm wide open. I will be conducting more tests and tests on other focal points and apertures. I might return this to the shop tomorrow. :(

I went back to the shop and returned the lens. They said they will send it to Sigma for checking and recalibrating. Good thing it's free. Hoping to get the lens back in two weeks.

My plan was to buy Nikon 70-200 but bought sigma for practical reason. I think its worth it!


http://www.flickr.com/photos/norinjasmin/

I know this lens doesn't beat the 70-200vr and shooting w/ someone w/ a D300 and 70-200vr made clear that the nikkor is the better glass. Anyway, still happy w/ the sigma even at wide open but not much at 200mm.

135mm 2.8 iso 140 1/60 (no PP just resize and borders)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/D200/snow.jpg

testing the same glass with my recently purchased (used) D2X... both photos taken using a tripod, resized using gThumb Image Viewer in Linux.

http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x276/pastorjeffg/set001.jpg

here's the other one...

http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x276/pastorjeffg/set002.jpg

will post some more photos next week, when my D300 arrives...

got the same lens, still no complaints! great quality for me..:)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/D200/dogz.jpg

Wedding attended Jan 6, 2008...

D70s, SIGMA 70-200mm ƒ2.8...

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2168/2214879107_c87696880d.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2033/2214882311_49aae06501.jpg

Saw version II of this. Its P4T more than the previous model. Both being sold at JT.

this is so intresting..

btw, it is easy to see if the item is defective or "lemon" right? i might get too jumpy and get it without testing thoroughly due to excitement. :)

i still have to save enough money to get one though.

hi guys, just want to check is there a Sony Mount of this lens? :)


saw this on sigma's website.
APO 70-200mm F2.8 II EX DG MACRO HSM for Pentax and Sony

here's the link.
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/lenses_all_details.asp?id=3350&navigator=3

wow.. good piece of lense..

sir randy_b, stunning, sharp photos! seems you got a nice copy of the lens. i'm starting to doubt my first gen sigma 70-200, although it was highly rated vs the macro version. did you have yours calibrated after purchase, or was it problem-free from the box?

How much is this now in the philippines?

i think its still 47k. hmm.

so whats the real difference bet. this and the 50-150 aside from the weight?

Whats the difference of this lense with Canon 70-200 f2.8L USM IS in terms of performance?

i think its still 47k. hmm.

so whats the real difference bet. this and the 50-150 aside from the weight?

Besides the focal range, this lens is compatible with full frame / 35mm cameras - DG designation.

The 50-150 is a DC lens and is compatible only with APS-C sized sensors.

got the same lens, still no complaints! great quality for me..:)

Johngil,
Where did you buy this lens? and how much did it cost?

Nephew
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/ravi.jpg

Dancers
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/bravo/b08.jpg

Guitarist
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/bravo/b09.jpg

Johngil,
Where did you buy this lens? and how much did it cost?

Its on sale right now.. 35k on version 1 and 37k on version 2 on JT. I Dont know the difference between the two version of this.

Its on sale right now.. 35k on version 1 and 37k on version 2 on JT. I Dont know the difference between the two version of this.

really? till when is the sale? i'm about to buy a new lens but im confused on whether to get the 70-200 or the 50-150 hehe. im using the d40; :Grin:

Fashion Show

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3034/2326006775_7ba8698470.jpg

hey nat! nice meeting u @ jt earlier. did u buy this darn great lens?

hey nat! nice meeting u @ jt earlier. did u buy this darn great lens?

Ey Marty! Nice meeting you too. :Grin: Yup, bought the lens wasn't able to resist. Got a good sample, fast focus and relatively sharp. Also acts as a 1.5 kg weight for my biceps. :D


Hope you have a fast turn around time for your prime.

do they have an OS? if nada, id prefer 70-200 2.8L non IS instead :)

Ey Marty! Nice meeting you too. :Grin: Yup, bought the lens wasn't able to resist. Got a good sample, fast focus and relatively sharp. Also acts as a 1.5 kg weight for my biceps. :D


.
haha! after seeing how fast and sharp that was how could you not buy it.? post some sample pics. so everyone here sees just how the version 2 smokes the old 70-200.

haha! after seeing how fast and sharp that was how could you not buy it.? post some sample pics. so everyone here sees just how the version 2 smokes the old 70-200.

@Marty

Sorry delayed reply. :Shock:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2154/2389324818_77271bcbba.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3142/2388493905_5f15a58bde.jpg

Overall I'm pleased with this piece of glass, bang for the buck. Some caveats a little soft wide open, warm tone, CA at end of zoom range & weighs like a tank. These are minor quips but I love the images I'm getting from the lens so far.:Grin:

Overall I'm pleased with this piece of glass, bang for the buck. Some caveats a little soft wide open, warm tone, CA at end of zoom range & weighs like a tank. These are minor quips but I love the images I'm getting from the lens so far.:Grin:

i have a gut feeling if you check carefully there may be a bit front/backfocusing, and if corrected it'll be much sharper. not saying that from your images ha, it's just that 2 out of the 3 sigmas i use had a teeny bit of front focusing. thought they were a bit soft wide open too. now they're really sharp wide open!

Guys, what's the purpose of locking the aperture at the larger aperture number? I recently bought a pre-owned Sigma 70-200 f2.8 APO EX HSM (non-macro, non-DG) and have been shooting it for days now. Since the manual isn't provided, I'm just wondering about "Lock aperture at largest aperture number"... what's the purpose? Thanks!

really? till when is the sale? i'm about to buy a new lens but im confused on whether to get the 70-200 or the 50-150 hehe. im using the d40; :Grin:

Poor D40

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3220/2388763109_355248e19d.jpg

Abused at the same by SB-600 and 70-200 HSM :-(

Ronald - I also used my 70-200 on my D40/x before. Lock? Since your lens has a manual aperature ring. You should put it on 2.8.

@Ryan, I saw Nat's locked at F22 i think?

@Ryan, I saw Nat's locked at F22 i think?

Is it the other way around? My bad :Grin: Anyway, its on one of those ends :D

An error message will be displayed if you are wrong.

hehe. thats okie.. Nat let me use his d40+70-200 i probably can't last 3 hours with that setup in my hands.

I use to think that the D40+70-200 2.8 would be an ok combo since the weight of the heavy lens is compensated by the ultra light D40/x body. Yet, when I used a D80/200 w/ this lens, found out that it was more balanced hence less likely of shaking.

Yes, the weight of the lens is something to get used too. I love this lens (can't afford the nikkor vr counterpart)

mine is locked at F32 as this is the 1st generation version. anyway, what's the purpose of locking at this aperture? i'm just curious, i wish a manual can be downloaded...

Ronald - Its used on SLRs (film) w/ no aperature setting on its body.

All modern lenses from Nikkor (G-type) w/o aperture rings are set to the highest aperture (smallest opening) by default. The aperture is then opened to the appropriate setting by camera when you are about to take the shot.

When using old lenses with manual aperture rings they have to be set to the highest aperture (smallest opening) to mimic new lenses, this will enable the camera to control the aperture.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikortek.htm

"For an AF camera to control the aperture on any non-G lens with an aperture ring you just turn the aperture ring to the minimum setting in orange (usually f/22) and flick the lock so it stays there, and then everything is done on the camera body. If for some reason the lens is set otherwise the camera will flash something like " F - - " to let you know to set the lens back to the minimum setting."

Although this is a Sigma lens it will have to work this way when mounted on Nikons.

Ronald - Its used on SLRs (film) w/ no aperature setting on its body.

aaaah, I see. So nothing that I can use for creative purposes. Thanks, Ryan!

I use to think that the D40+70-200 2.8 would be an ok combo since the weight of the heavy lens is compensated by the ultra light D40/x body. Yet, when I used a D80/200 w/ this lens, found out that it was more balanced hence less likely of shaking.

Yes, the weight of the lens is something to get used too. I love this lens (can't afford the nikkor vr counterpart)


That's so true! :D A heavier body is better to counter balance the weight of the lens. I mounted it on Mic's D80, the combo had better handling. A D80, batt grip and this lens would rock.

That's so true! :D A heavier body is better to counter balance the weight of the lens. I mounted it on Mic's D80, the combo had better handling. A D80, batt grip and this lens would rock.

If a batt grip isn't available, then another way to balance the setup is to mount a flash (SB600, 800, etc.)...

But as I always shoot with a tripod, I have nothing to worry about :-)

If a batt grip isn't available, then another way to balance the setup is to mount a flash (SB600, 800, etc.)...

But as I always shoot with a tripod, I have nothing to worry about :-)


I have a friend who has this lens mounted on a D70, he will not use the lens / camera combo unless he's wearing bicep compressors and using a monopod. :D

Sample test shots -

Settings:

Exposure: 1/1000 sec
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 200 mm
ISO Speed: 200

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2247/2397320172_93988c8cf0_b.jpg

Exposure: 1/320 sec
Aperture: f/2.8
Focal Length: 200 mm
ISO Speed: 200

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2088/2388742993_aa42df85eb_b.jpg

For those who asked, I got this pre-owned non-macro version for P18,000.00.

Ronald - Nice shots and at that price, its a steal!!!

ryan - have you tried the mark 2 version of the lens??????:D I want one :D hehehehehe

Spam - I haven't, are the changes that significant? Based at the website, focuses closer and new lens coating.

ryan - have you tried the mark 2 version of the lens??????:D I want one :D hehehehehe

Don't you have one already?

Don't you have one already?

it aint mine dude :D hehehehe i wish it was mine though :D

My dog bored to death...

shot at 2.8

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/tummy001small.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/tummy002small.jpg

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y12/rsh78ph/tummy003small.jpg

My lens is ver1 and tried to look for a review or comparo of my lens to ver2.

hi, if ever one of you want to buy the new version of the sigma 70 200mm 2.8 I'm selling mine.:)

I have a friend who has this lens mounted on a D70, he will not use the lens / camera combo unless he's wearing bicep compressors and using a monopod. :D

Hey! I resemble that remark! :D Damn thing's heavy... I'w doing weights now though so it doesn't bother me anymore. I hardly use the mono but still use the wrist brace though...

Nat!! SWAP!!! :Grin: my v1 for your v2!

Hey! I resemble that remark! :D Damn thing's heavy... I'w doing weights now though so it doesn't bother me anymore. I hardly use the mono but still use the wrist brace though...

Nat!! SWAP!!! :Grin: my v1 for your v2!

Randy! Buffness ka na ba ngayon? Trans: Are you buff? :Grin:

Randy! Buffness ka na ba ngayon? Trans: Are you buff? :Grin:

I still love my 70-200 even if it's so damn heavy... Love the colors and the bokeh! Just need to get the 2x TC for more reach...

@Nat - Can I borrow your 10-20? Hehe... I wanna test it against the Tokina I have on loan. Might finally get my own UWA at the end of the month.

Nope! Not buff-ness... Bab-ness pa din! :D

Let's get the shooters here together and go out of town or sumthin...

I borrowed one from a friend. It's quite heavy. I wish it had an OS.
Cheers!

I borrowed one from a friend. It's quite heavy. I wish it had an OS.
Cheers!

OS would definitely make this a much better lens... Unfortunately, SIGMA has this habit of pricing OS lenses near enough the competition's main products (IS/VR versions) that it might just be better to bite the bullet and spend that little bit more for the Nikkor or Canon version... :Scared: