i don't know if this is supposed to be in this thread, but there seems to be no thread for other lenses like tamron/tokina/etc.

does anyone have this lens? it is constant aperture 2.8, how do you find this lens? any reviews? thank you

available in henry's - hidalgo (currently on sale). maybe you can be the first to try it out. then post some samples here.

malay mo magustuhan mo IQ, baka bilhin mo pa. :) 22k yata.

i just got one today :) will post some shots soon. so far so good. it feels like a cross of my old 28-200mm nikkor and the new 18-70mm DX kit lens. it's pretty small and handy. about the same size as the 18-70mm 3.5-4.5 dx lens.

chewy - thanks, please do post your shots and review. i don't know how will it compare to nikon 17-55, but the price is a lot cheaper

aris - yes, it's 22,500 until saturday only, maybe i'll get one on the next sale, i just want more reviews from our fellow photographers here, thanks

hey chewy, post some sample shots!

here ya go!

i uploaded these images on to flickr, click on the links na lang to see exif information about each shot. cheers!

me!!! http://www.flickr.com/photos/chewychua/262760510/

http://static.flickr.com/92/262760510_255b82d0b7.jpg

ela's first tamron shot http://www.flickr.com/photos/chewychua/262760511/

http://static.flickr.com/121/262760511_de126e8a10.jpg

flower power - http://www.flickr.com/photos/chewychua/262760513/

http://static.flickr.com/97/262760513_24943e7579.jpg

100% crop - http://www.flickr.com/photos/chewychua/262760514/

http://static.flickr.com/112/262760514_84a32fed79.jpg

Wow chewy! That tammy 17-50mm f/2.8 is really suhhhwwweeettt! Nice shots bro! That lens of yours is damn sharp and render very lively and vivid colors! Congrats! :)

Wow chewy! That tammy 17-50mm f/2.8 is really suhhhwwweeettt! Nice shots bro! That lens of yours is damn sharp and render very lively and vivid colors! Congrats! :)

Does seem like a keeper! Final test Chewy! Print them! :Grin:

Good review here from LetsGoDigital http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/news/articles/story_6359.html

" The new lens achieves a minimum focus distance of 27cm over the entire zoom range, one of the best in its class"

It's got to be good.

very nice. i also tested that around 4 months ago. canon mount that's why i really hadn't tested it thouroughly. comment: pro: sharp wide open, but no silent motor. that's just it.

that's very sharp chewy! and a nice twist to a self-portrait ha! :D

congrats on your new lens. bang for the buck! might get one - but still waiting for tokina's version.

the tokina will up the ante by offering a wider 16mm :)
but i'm really pleased with this tammy. It's not "warm" like my sigma and it reminds me of my tokina 28-70mm but of course in a tidy package.

oh yeah, you guys might want to look at my signature. hehehe

hmmm . . . good buy! galing nice bokeh too . . . suweet!!! :)

Good review here from LetsGoDigital http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/news/articles/story_6359.html

" The new lens achieves a minimum focus distance of 27cm over the entire zoom range, one of the best in its class"

It's got to be good.

Jerome, salamat sa link pre! :Grin:

yep chewy, saw that sig a day or 2 ago. but i just got a 35 f/2 - di ko na naantay eh!
good deal sana yan 28mm

my bro's canon-mount 17-50 came from the supermommy. :)

chewy - post some more, specially samples of low light shots, thanks

maganda, maganda. parang nikkor na rin. :)

Bili na Yuri Boi! :D

Bili na Yuri Boi! :D

uy nanjan ka pala bro-der!

i got a new toy just the other night. secret muna, test ko muna.

Hello, I'm resurrecting a very old thread. (searching is a virtue they say).

I'm looking at the Tammy 17-50 f2.8 for my very first lens purchase. I'm really not into uwa and telephotos (yet). I love my D40's kit lens, but it lets me down on flashless indoor shots. And after seeing a lot of photos here I'm beginning to find it not sharp/contrasty enough. I've got a couple of questions for you experienced ones.


Can it autofocus on the D40?
What does constant aperture mean? Is it stuck at f2.8?
Is the 2.8 fast enough for strobeless indoor shots with dim lights (e.g. night events, hotels, churches, a room lit only by a single lamp, etc). I'm cool with a shallow DOF by the way.
How much is this now?
I'm also considering the Sigma equivalent with macro (forgot the gobbledygook name) which is more expensive I bet. I've read more good reviews with the tammy, but i think i might find the macro useful for (very close) portrait shots. I'd like to hear your opinions.Much thanks for the blessed soul(s) who will answer these questions. Feel free to suggest a better substitute for the kit lens. Just not a Nikkor please - I'm selling a kidney to buy new gear and I only have one to spare.

:Grin:

@christian

the second version autofocuses on the d40.
it has constant 2.8 aperture.
yup its fast enough.
17k @ watson
some people despise the sigma..you are lucky if you get a good copy the first time you get one.

1. You need the model w/ N II designation to work with D40
2. No, it's not "stuck" at f/2.8 and can go small up to f/32. The f/2.8 is available at all focal lengths from 17mm to 50mm. There is no aperture ring.
3. Depends how steady your hands are
4. Got mine for 17,500
6. Give the Sigma a try

The f/2.8 is available at all focal lengths from 17mm to 50mm.


this is what i meant.. :D

tamron=cheaper, works like a charm compared to the sigma based on reviews...but its worth a try :D

@Martin/Arnold

Thank you so much for the info! Now I'm going to rush to Quiapo and try them myself. :)

man.. this sure is a sweet lens.. hehe

have you guys tried sigmas 18-50 f2.8?

which ones better? hehe

man.. this sure is a sweet lens.. hehe

have you guys tried sigmas 18-50 f2.8?

which ones better? hehe

In terms of build, Sigma wins. In terms of IQ, still there is sample variation. If you will be picky with quality and want true AF-S/HSM get the nikkor. None of these 3rd party counter parts has fast focusing.

In terms of build, Sigma wins. In terms of IQ, still there is sample variation. If you will be picky with quality and want true AF-S/HSM get the nikkor. None of these 3rd party counter parts has fast focusing.

haha. as i've said before.. poor people can't be choosy. hehe. can you guys post sample pics from both lenses? hehe. :D

haha. as i've said before.. poor people can't be choosy. hehe. can you guys post sample pics from both lenses? hehe. :D

As requested, below is the tamron:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2178/2445457150_eb8ae00344_o.jpg


This is with the nikkor:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3134/2477843183_b58e8d5bc7_b.jpg

Tamron would do you ok if you don't mind losing its value after a few uses. Plus the flimsy build really turned me off... There are lots of pollen here specially during spring time, and it could get inside the lens barrel as you zoom in and out. There are also times that my fingers disturb the AF ring when focusing. Try it first from someone you know then you'll know what you want.

hmm.. the tamron faired well with the nikkor. heheh. nikkor's sharper though..

hmm if you said the built wasn't that good, i guess i shouldn't hurry in buying :D

thanks for the help sir! :)

i use this lens alot especialy in low light! i love it! :) some say comparable to nikkor 17-50 :)

please visit http://rheiary.multiply.com to see some of the pictures

nice.... more sample pls......

downside is no VC. :D

gotta wait if ever Tammy will release a VC model for it... :D

17-50mm Focal Length @ f/2.8 who needs VC??

^ i have shaky hands sometimes hehehe... :P

As requested, below is the tamron:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2178/2445457150_eb8ae00344_o.jpg

This is with the nikkor:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3134/2477843183_b58e8d5bc7_b.jpg (http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3134/2477843183_b58e8d5bc7_b.jpg)



Nikkor seems to be sharper and has more natural colors. :Shock:

I would recommend, saving up for the nikkor. 17-55 range is your most used range, unless your a wildlife photographer. 17-55 range is versatile, you can do landscape, portrait, create boke with out using long telephoto etc... I think it has its seat on the street photography classification. Go for Nikkor! :)

Jaybee, with all due respect, your two photos don't compare at all.. Much like apples and oranges.

It's really simple, if you can afford a Nikkor, get a Nikkor. A Tamron will never be a Nikkor. :D

Just look at the price- 17K (Tamron) vs. 50K (Nikkor)

If the IQ difference is that big and you can't sleep over it, just get the Nikkor.

Got this lens two weeks ago... so far so gooood! just ask for the one with motor if you want to use it on Nikon D40/D40x/D60... IQ comparable to Nikkor 17-55.

Yes, a Tamron will never be a Nikkor, but the price makes it a better choice. I would suggest that if you want to save for a better lens... save for the new trinity which you can use with an FX camera.

Enjoy shooting... be contented with what you have:)

I think it has its seat on the street photography classification. Go for Nikkor!

mount it on a d300 and prepare to scare away your subjects.. you just lost the candid feeling..

Got this lens two weeks ago... so far so gooood! just ask for the one with motor if you want to use it on Nikon D40/D40x/D60... IQ comparable to Nikkor 17-55.

Yes, a Tamron will never be a Nikkor, but the price makes it a better choice. I would suggest that if you want to save for a better lens... save for the new trinity which you can use with an FX camera.

Enjoy shooting... be contented with what you have:)

Hi Ricky...OT here: pardon my ignorance, what are the 3 Nikkor trinity? Thanks:)

Hi Doc Diego,
sorry didn't mention the new trinity... so it should be...

Nikkor 14-24 2.8 AF-S N
Nikkor 24-70 2.8 AF-S N
Nikkor 70-200 2.8 AF-S VR


Buy now!:D

Hi Doc Diego,
sorry didn't mention the new trinity... so it should be...

Nikkor 14-24 2.8 AF-S N
Nikkor 24-70 2.8 AF-S N
Nikkor 70-200 2.8 AF-S VR


Buy now!:D

WOW... those 3s are worth a fortune or "inheritance"....hehehe:Grin:. BTW how about the Nikkor 17-35 mm f/2.8...is it for FX too? How about the IQ? Thanks again:)

The Nikkor 17-35mm is compatible for the full-frame and it's not an FX.

IQ? Oh, I could have gotten this one but I wanted a longer range :)

I hope to compare my Tamron and the Nikkor soon with help from my pro friend at her studio :)

Jaybee, with all due respect, your two photos don't compare at all.. Much like apples and oranges.

It's really simple, if you can afford a Nikkor, get a Nikkor. A Tamron will never be a Nikkor. :D

Just look at the price- 17K (Tamron) vs. 50K (Nikkor)

If the IQ difference is that big and you can't sleep over it, just get the Nikkor.

Yeah, hard to do one more set of test, since I already returned the Tamron. I guess the thing that bugged me was the build, IQ was kinda good, comparable to my Nikkor. But these are a few things I cant't leave with that I found from the tamron with BIM:

- Slower focusing than HSM, AF-s and even slower compared to the older Tamron with out motor. My kid already ran away and didn't get the shot I wanted.
- The stutter focus adjustments after locking focus then shooting in continuous mode.
- On my two samples motor sometimes stopped focusing (which you said also happened to you, which is not an issue for some people since, they can live with it).
- On one of my samples, motor screetched for like 3-5 seconds the first time i mounted it and tried focusing.

In summary, if i had a D80, i would get the older version and not think about the Nikkor brother. If you don't mind losing the value of your lens after a while, then tamron would be the choice. You could even save bigger if you can get a second hand copy of this lens, since its price should be substantially lower than the brand new. Well all if this is just my personal opinion, we all have our own :)

how is this lens compared to the sigma 17-50 2.8 HSM? is the image quality at par?

mount it on a d300 and prepare to scare away your subjects.. you just lost the candid feeling..

True... hehehe. It's like your aiming a canon to their face. It's comical on my D40 but am very happy with it :) Just get permission when shooting someone on the street to avoiding an argument. Better yet, get a telephoto, 70-200 VR, drool..... That way you are not intrusive :)

how is this lens compared to the sigma 17-50 2.8 HSM? is the image quality at par?

Haven't tried the sigma yet, but heard satisfied users from the sigma thread. If you want faster focusing and a local warranty, get the sigma then have it calibrated to have sure 100% sharp copy. :) Again, it's your money, so in the end its still up to you. :)

Why is it that this particular focal lenght, 17-50, 17-55 or 18-50 2.8s, have comparos that each say the quality, sharpness, etc. are close to the nikkor.

Unlike the nikkor 28-70 2.8 "the beast" and the new 24-70 nano (w/c they say is better than the beast) and of course the 70-200vr who are hands down better than its 3rd party equivalents.

cant help to compare it to the nikkor.. all i can say that is.. in terms of focusing speed.. the nikkor blows away all the 3rd party competition..

software can fix vignette, "sharpness", and CAs.. but not focus accuracy and speed..

if i am an event photographer.. i need every speed and accuracy i can get to capture that moment(especially indoors and low-light).. and fix some vignette,ca problems in software later on..

back to the tamron.. i heard that the previous version focuses faster on the d200 than the newer one..

kikoy - tried the tamron, 17-50 and another mid zoom 2.8 but something felt different so I got me a sigma. Unlucky me since I got my sigmas when prices were substantially higher, talk about depreciation!

I also have to agree w/ you, the 18-50 sigma's focusing speed isn't as fast as the nikkor but it can still do events.

Hi folks, I just came from my pro friend's studio where I took shots using the Nikkor and Tamron. I used my D40 for the comparison shots.

What I discovered is that when the Tamron was mounted on the D2x and D3, it focuses so much faster than with the D40. She was telling me about the different focus mechanism of those two cameras. In fact, the Tamron is much faster, smoother, and more silent than the 85mm f/1.8 AF that I also tested. Even my Tamron 11-18mm benefited from those bodies. Same experience, more silent, fast and smoother. But heck, I can't own a D2x and in my wildest dreams, a D3!:D

I have the D2x set to AF-C and I was panning and the Tamron follows just as fast. But, back to the D40, it goes into "slow" focus mode once more. :D

For a hobbyist on a budget, and at less than 1/3 the price of the comparable Nikkor lense, it gives us an opportunity to enjoy. I'm enjoying mine, that's for sure. :Grin:

Yes, I did experience focus lock up with my D40 and my solution was re-focus to another subject without turning off the camera.

I hope to compare my Tamron and the Nikkor soon with help from my pro friend at her studio :)

How was the comparison?

Hi Cocoy, here it is - http://www.roadtonirvana.net/photography/Nikkor.vs.Tamron.htm

Hi Cocoy, here it is - http://www.roadtonirvana.net/photography/Nikkor.vs.Tamron.htm

I was also waiting for this, but the samples given were at small apertures. I think the deciding point for image quality for both lenses would be by comparing them wide open at f/2.8 on which you bought the lens for... hehehe to get the f/2.8 experience :) just my thoughts... Happy shooting! :) If Tamron improves their B.I.M. technology, then I may buy one again for a light weight setup.

how's the weight of the nikkor 17-50mm?

jaybee, you're right that's why I was so disappointed to find out when I got home that I didn't have the f/2.8 for the Nikkor. I'll see if she's not busy soon and bugger her again, maybe this time with a live person :)

earvin, the Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 is much bigger and heavier (forgot to take comparo shots din) and when mounted on the D40, the pair looks awkward. :D

how's the weight of the nikkor 17-50mm?

Its a big ass heavy lens. It will not feel balanced on a D40. Maybe it would have better handling on your D80 plus a grip. The 17-55 is 7++ grams. Imagine me mounting it on a D40 plus SB-800... Poor D40, it felt like my D40 was about to cry. Got a third party grip for my D40 to have better handling, I am now a happy camper. :) If you want light weight 2.8 zoom lens, your better off with tamron. It almost felt half the weight of the Nikkor.

Tamron & Nikkor comparison, updated - http://www.roadtonirvana.net/photography/Nikkor.vs.Tamron.htm

:)

Its a big ass heavy lens. It will not feel balanced on a D40. Maybe it would have better handling on your D80 plus a grip. The 17-55 is 7++ grams. Imagine me mounting it on a D40 plus SB-800... Poor D40, it felt like my D40 was about to cry. Got a third party grip for my D40 to have better handling, I am now a happy camper. :) If you want light weight 2.8 zoom lens, your better off with tamron. It almost felt half the weight of the Nikkor.

700++ grams is nothing... the new 14-24 weighs in at 1kg, add that to the 1kg i carry on my neck (D2H) with an Sb800 then you can complain. Yes the 17-55 is a porker, but it's one of the best events lenses around.

The Tamron however is a much lighter animal or should i say Kitten, with an all plastic construction that's the hallmark of all Tamron lenses. I, as a pro would not entrust my events with the "plastic fantastic"" Tammy, but as a hobbyist its an excellent lens. It's light weight and easy handling make it perfect for avid amatuers. Not a bad lens if I may say so.

Ken T.

Tamron & Nikkor comparison, updated - http://www.roadtonirvana.net/photography/Nikkor.vs.Tamron.htm

:)

Clicking on the sample pics does not seem to work, cant see the actual file. Is it just me or you guys also was not able to open the pics? I can see the thumbnail though

Sorry, wrong path on the larger images... I'm uploading the edited file...

sir sorry for my stupid or what the heck question...which is faster in terms of AF, the tamron 17-50, sigma 17-70 or my d40 kit lens 18-55? thank you very much!

so if the tamron is slow focusing with the d40, how will you compare it with the kitlens???? so that i will have and idea before purchasing the lens. thanks.

the tamron focuses "almost" as fast as an 18-70 Nikkor on the D40. tried it myself:) definitely faster than the 18-55 kit lens IMO

ah ok. i think this will be a good buy for hobbyist like me...

Does anyone here encounters problems with their Tamron 17-50 on a D90?

Having owned both the Tamron 17-50 B.I.M. (returned) and the Nikkor 17-55 (sold), I would have to say that the Nikkor is definitely faster focusing. The Tamron did not cut it for me when using it indoors as the focus seems to hunt more often and not fast enought to lock focus on my Active daughter. Comparing it to the Kitlens for the D40, I would have to say that the Kitlens seems to focus faster for me, but its just me, no comparative test done. One other thing you may notice compared to the kitlens is that the focusing ring is moves while focusing and can be irritating at times.

This lens is definitely a keeper...But be warned, there are two versions of this lens, AVOID the NEW motorized version, it will definitely give you headaches more than you could ever imagine
(ie. Intermittent focusing problems, soft images,slower focus vs.the old version IRONICALLY etc.) I had a chance to compare these two versions at a shop in Belgium but the OLD non-motor Japan version has won me over,...My only slight complaint is the shitty noise...but then again, I got used to it :)


In my Flickr account, almost all of my shots came from my Tamron...awesome lens :)

Does anyone here encounters problems with their Tamron 17-50 on a D90?

The motorized version is notorious for having AF problems with the D90, If you have it...I'm not surprised

@jaybeelanuza - what do you mean by this???

"One other thing you may notice compared to the kitlens is that the focusing ring is moves while focusing and can be irritating at times."

is it the focus ring of kitlens or the tammy??? coz the focus ring of the kitlens will also rotate/move if it is focusing....

The motorized version is notorious for having AF problems with the D90, If you have it...I'm not surprised

Is there a solution to this problem? TIA

@jaybeelanuza - what do you mean by this???

"One other thing you may notice compared to the kitlens is that the focusing ring is moves while focusing and can be irritating at times."

is it the focus ring of kitlens or the tammy??? coz the focus ring of the kitlens will also rotate/move if it is focusing....

i think jaybee is talking about the tamron. the focus ring rotates while focusing same as the kit lens. the difference is the focus ring of the tamron is not on the front element of the glass unlike the kit lens so CPLs can still be used

How does this lens compare to the Sigma 18-50/2.8 HSM version?:):D:Grin:

How does this lens compare to the Sigma 18-50/2.8 HSM version?:):D:Grin:

IMO IQ wise, its better than the Sigma, AF Speed goes to the Sigma.

How does this lens compare to the Sigma 18-50/2.8 HSM version?:):D:Grin:


According to some reviews, the Tammy is sharper and better IQ than the sigma. That's why I settle for the Tammy but unfortunately I'm having problems(AF issue) with it on my d90. :(

Is there a solution to this problem? TIA

Unfortunately there isn't...Tamron just made a stupid mistake to release a half-baked version 2 of this lens, just to say it again that the new version has SLOWER AF than the old version

i love my tammy! very sharp! and focus speed is good for me.

sample pic (no photoshop) crop only
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y285/jerrickngo/taiwan%202008/DSC_0302-1.jpg
D200
50mm
1/80
f4.5
ISO 500


Minor photoshop
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y285/jerrickngo/warehouse/DSC_0149.jpg

D200
17mm
1/50
F3.2
ISO 500

This lens is worth buying. Tamron cant be Nikon but the price of the Nikon cant be Tamron. price is only 1/3 of nikon's 17/55mm 2.8

Here are a couple sample shots from the Tamron (both indoors and outdoors)...If you get a good copy, I think it will stay in your camera 90 percent of the time :)

http://i605.photobucket.com/albums/tt138/NikenTurda/DSC_0648_resize.jpghttp://i605.photobucket.com/albums/tt138/NikenTurda/DSC_0970_resize.jpg

guys, im planning to ditched my 18-135 kit lens. is this lens(tamron 17-50) worth an upgrade for a walk-around lens? thanks..

grrr i want this lens. i'll sell my nikkor 50mm 1.8 so i can buy this lens..... hehehehe

guys, im planning to ditched my 18-135 kit lens. is this lens(tamron 17-50) worth an upgrade for a walk-around lens? thanks..

Hehe, don't ask a Question if you already know the answer :D

ok got it. but how can i tell if it was the first version or the motorized version? tnx.

ok got it. but how can i tell if it was the first version or the motorized version? tnx.

Simple > Ask the sales personnel :)

Another simple way of finding out is to see the make (but Im not sure Of This)

*Made In Taiwan (New Version)
*Made In Japan (Old AF Version)

ok got it. but how can i tell if it was the first version or the motorized version? tnx.

If you see the B.I.M tag on the box that means Built In Motor

Look at the lens mount(metal) and it will not have a screw drive. If without built-in motor, the screw drive will be pretty obvious.
ok got it. but how can i tell if it was the first version or the motorized version? tnx.

i can't wait to have one..... arf!

See my thread link below which all shots in Singapore were taken with D90 and Tamron 17-50 f/2.8.... So far I'm enjoying my tammy!!! :Grin:

http://digitalphotographer.com.ph/forum/showthread.php?t=33501

Just got mine, luvin it!
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs044.snc4/34576_454050052393_731007393_6634413_8026047_n.jpg

http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs038.ash2/35244_454468062393_731007393_6646366_7271844_n.jpg (http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs038.ash2/35244_454468062393_731007393_6646366_7271844_n.jpg )

http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs060.snc4/35370_455390572393_731007393_6677888_2754571_n.jpg (http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs060.snc4/35370_455390572393_731007393_6677888_2754571_n.jpg )
Tamron 17-50 no BIM version on a D80

reviving this thread coz....

just bought this lens, yesterday , BIM non VC. I found it sharp and better than any nikon kit lens. I decided to buy this lens rather than the 35mm DX because of the versatile of the focal length aside for having an aperture of 2.8.

I will post some sample photos after some time

Tamron 17-50 .... aside from a good focal length ...this lens is SHARPPPPP ;-)

Sample shots
http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad49/ridenrachel/Photography/DSC_3842.jpg (http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad49/ridenrachel/Photography/DSC_3842.jpg)
Cropped--> See how clear the letter text
http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad49/ridenrachel/DSC_3842CROP-1.jpg (http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad49/ridenrachel/DSC_3842CROP-1.jpg)

http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad49/ridenrachel/DSC_4028.jpg
http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad49/ridenrachel/DSC_4007.jpg
http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad49/ridenrachel/DSC_4015.jpg

Sorry for being a newb but I plan to get a tamron 17-50mm. Which version would be better the SP AF17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF). OR The SP AF17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II VC LD Aspherical (IF)?? I also read that the japan version is better than the taiwan lenses. My camera is a d7000 btw. Ty

if you will read all the messages in this thread.... you will find the non VC much better

Some More...From BELGIUM

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5163/5361807006_beb950ab78_b.jpg (http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5163/5361807006_beb950ab78_b.jpg)

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5288/5361808674_129b7ebf1b_b.jpg (http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5288/5361808674_129b7ebf1b_b.jpg)

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5165/5364545115_415534af11_b.jpg (http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5165/5364545115_415534af11_b.jpg)

@kenneth

Nice one dude!

Thanks Adam!

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5283/5365965340_08b7ed3280_b.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5248/5361809308_6e9a5df2a9_b.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5048/5365965956_3211b50e69_b.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5288/5365964876_c478865b70_b.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5007/5361186655_d1a96368b0_b.jpg

I own this lens (tammy 17-50mm f/2.8 non-VC)

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5122/5312343998_50863fb772.jpg
exif: f/8.0 35mm iso200 1/100

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5242/5312334108_0ee94f6a09.jpg
exif: f/9.0 50mm iso160 1/200

Thanks Adam!

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5283/5365965340_08b7ed3280_b.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5248/5361809308_6e9a5df2a9_b.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5048/5365965956_3211b50e69_b.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5288/5365964876_c478865b70_b.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5007/5361186655_d1a96368b0_b.jpg

hey bro, great shots! btw,are these pictures taken with without the motor version or the BIM? thanks!

Finally i owned one...with BIM paired with my D90.. hope to share pictures soon

hey bro, great shots! btw,are these pictures taken with without the motor version or the BIM? thanks!

Thanx Alex!

No-Motor

Hello Sirs/Ma'am. What would you prefer, the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 non vc or the Nikkor 50mm f1.8? Hope to hear your thoughts,TIA. :D

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5213/5387341238_34a1b6e223_z.jpg (http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5213/5387341238_34a1b6e223_z.jpg)
tamron 17-50 2.8 non vc
f/5.6 ISO 320 speed 1/25
no pp just crop
available light

nice one gerry. i really love this lens :-)

Just sharing my experience (I fix lens as part-time) with this lens.
No intention to scare those who bought this lens or those planning to buy.

If you noticed any "play" in the zoom barrel, stop using and get it fixed.

Here's a DIY procedure I did for your reference

http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/showthread.php?t=694767

The front part of the lens may become loose as well.
It's also a simple fix. Someone posted the procedure in youtube.
YouTube - Re: Tamron 17-50/2.8

He used a metal screw driver to remove the front cover but a bamboo barbecue stick would be much safer to use to prevent accidentally scratching the lens.
In some cases, need to reposition the optics. A simple trick is to look for the glue markings to return the lens to it's original position. If lens not positioned properly, the lens may not be able to focus at infinity or distance scale is not accurate


It's better to get a simple problem fixed before it gets worse

@davidhilos (http://www.digitalphotographer.com.ph/forum/member.php?u=4913) thanks for the tip!.. btw do you do cleaning service also?

Hello Sirs/Ma'am. What would you prefer, the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 non vc or the Nikkor 50mm f1.8? Hope to hear your thoughts,TIA. :D

a Definite YES, but as the cliche goes...it's apples to oranges

My 50mm 1.8 (sold it already) has comparable sharpness with my Tammy @ f/4. The 17-50 has
Much better usability, much better warmth and color.

I never had the chance to fully utilize the 50mm's 1.8 advantage because of its horrible performance wide-open

@davidhilos (http://www.digitalphotographer.com.ph/forum/member.php?u=4913) thanks for the tip!.. btw do you do cleaning service also?

Yes, but I'm not based in Philippines

hi all. I have grown out from my D60 and am planning to upgrade to a D7K. Part of that would be to have a new walkaround lens, a new UWA and retain my 55-200 and 50/1.8, all of which would be upgraded to the 2.8 trinity and a 1.4 later on (i hope so..:Grin:).

So here is where the 17-50 comes as it can be the walkaround as I gather resources for the 24-70/2.8. My only dillemma is that the 17-50 overlaps with the Tokina 12-24 which would be my UWA option. I have read a lot and I would just like to confirm if the Tokina 12-24 becomes 18-36 just like a 17-50 is 26-75 on a FF sensor. If it does, would this mean that i rather have a Tokina 11-16 instead?

Thanks in advance for your answers. I do landscapes/travel, streets and just recently, portraits.:)

ilan ang aperture nya?

ilan ang aperture nya?

f 2.8 from 17-50mm FL

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5219/5418522448_8d816ce18c_z.jpg

My first share using this superb lens.

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5054/5431179322_ef928f4b52_z.jpg
pa share ulit...

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5019/5430857658_a3149230dc_z.jpg

isa pa.

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5175/5433649301_79496e8bd3.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5215/5385106451_cca55e265e.jpg

http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa103/paopao19_02/DSC_0649.jpg

Tamron 17-50 f2.8 Non VC
F/4.8- 1/15

http://public.blu.livefilestore.com/y1prOvvbyQFTRA34F-w_cLiv8vmb8lEMcAlElm4ja5rkUbe3cGbxLfdPqKrVk-tggrQg0x8dqRJLA8vDgAR_wTSpg/origDSC_9701.JPG

hello just got my tanron yesterday? paano po gagawin pag may sloght backfocus ung lens?

English only, Kevin.

great pictures! super sharp. im eying this lens for my next GAS list...

Hi, I have read the posts on this thread, but I am still contemplating on which lens I would buy; nikkor 16-85mm vr or the Tamron 17-50mm vc? I have also read issues on the Tamron, but most of them are using Canon body. Please pm me your advice on this one. Thanks guys and good day to everyone.

I never had a focus issues with the Tamron using my D300s, but with my D60 it is a different story.

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5134/5502745502_41e35c3a23_z.jpg

OSHIN

My share Using this ultra sharp lens..

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5139/5509441792_962a4f9bec_z.jpg

Camera Nikon D90
Exposure 0.006 sec (1/160)
Aperture f/4.0
Focal Length 42 mm
ISO Speed 200
Exposure Bias 0 EV

http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa103/paopao19_02/DSC_0689-1.jpg

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5093/5514770758_889075d481_z.jpg

Camera Nikon D90
Exposure 0.005 sec (1/200)
Aperture f/4.0
Focal Length 27 mm
ISO Speed 200
Exposure Bias 0 EV
Flash On, Return not detected

Pa Share

nice shots adam!

just wanna share my tamron 17-50 shots...
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5135/5460536824_87f7ed0257_z.jpg

old shots...personal opinion: the tamron 17-50 is sharp (im using the w/0 bim and w/o VC version ) nice contrast also...hehe

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5216/5469586563_74baff609f_z.jpg

as you can see in this photo,the conrast is diff from shots taken with my nikkor lenses...(without touching the WB slide during PP) ...if you compare SOOC shots,nikkor and the tamron 17-50 you can see the diff in the contrast...this is just my personal observation.tnx


"hapontukin"
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5291/5444163437_2198fd53ce_z.jpg

thanks guys, I do appreciate anything you shared, and great photos too! However, there's another thing that bothered me, about the Error Message "F--" when Tamron 17-50mm vc is mounted on a D90, a lot pf people are complaining about this. I hope anyone can enlighten me on this issue and I would gladly appreciate it. Thanks again.

I should have bought this lens... till next, seems the non-vc is getting harder to find, can anyone please share any seller of this lens? thanks...

since some recommended to buy the non motorized version, do you guys have problems with manual focusing with this lens? :( im planning to buy this but im afraid using manual focus is a hassle.

I've been thru hidalgo shops and vet specialist. they no longer have the NON motorized version.

get the motorized version NON-VC instead.

sample shot no PP done

http://i1103.photobucket.com/albums/g468/ace_atienza/DSC_0173.jpg

Congrats on your new toy Sir...:)

a Definite YES, but as the cliche goes...it's apples to oranges

My 50mm 1.8 (sold it already) has comparable sharpness with my Tammy @ f/4. The 17-50 has
Much better usability, much better warmth and color.

I never had the chance to fully utilize the 50mm's 1.8 advantage because of its horrible performance wide-open

From the looks of the photo here, and my own experience with the 50mm 1.8, I would go with the Tamron 17-50. You get comparable sharpness with the flexibility. Btw, I also sold my 50mm 1.8 (in favor of a Nikon 35mm 1.8) because it performed poorly in low light conditions (poor autofocus, contrast and color). It did perform well in good lighting conditions. HTH.

this lens is for DX bodies right? So like other FX lenses that you multiply it by 1.5 the range is really 17-50mm on DX?

this lens is for DX bodies right? So like other FX lenses that you multiply it by 1.5 the range is really 17-50mm on DX?

yeah, kinda confused with DX-FX range as well (17-50 on DX = 24-70 on FX, 35mm on DX = 50mm on FX etc) I've been shooting for more than four years and I still don't understand this thing :Grin: I guess I'm still a noob after all

somebody care to enlighten 'us' please? :D I know all about the crop factor and such, but my question is..why is there a (example) 24mm equivalent on FX thingy??? Please don't get your answers from GOOGLE, it'll be obvious

yeah, kinda confused with DX-FX range as well (17-50 on DX = 24-70 on FX, 35mm on DX = 50mm on FX etc) I've been shooting for more than four years and I still don't understand this thing :Grin: I guess I'm still a noob after all

somebody care to enlighten 'us' please? :D I know all about the crop factor and such, but my question is..why is there a (example) 24mm equivalent on FX thingy??? Please don't get your answers from GOOGLE, it'll be obvious

For uniformity's sake [aka so as not to confuse us] DX lens numbers follow the FX. Hence, the 35mm 1.8 DX lens is actually a 52mm when mounted on a DX camera. So this 17-50 DX lens will be a 24-70mm when mounted on a DX lens.

They tell you the lens is DX or FX for the ff. reasons:
- mount an FX lens on a DX/FX camera and it will work fine
- mount a DX lens on a DX camera and it will work fine
- MOUNT A DX LENS ON AN FX CAMERA AND YOU WILL HAVE LIMITED RANGE
(ie. mount a 17-50 DX lens and you can only use it as 24-50mm)

Hope this helps (and hope I'm right as I'm still half asleep). :Grin:

So basing on hermie's post being a DX user (d7000) its ideal to get the 17-50 cause it corresponds with THE NIKON 's 24 to 70 FX lens (which is very expensive).

For uniformity's sake [aka so as not to confuse us] DX lens numbers follow the FX. Hence, the 35mm 1.8 DX lens is actually a 52mm when mounted on a DX camera. So this 17-50 DX lens will be a 24-70mm when mounted on a DX lens.

They tell you the lens is DX or FX for the ff. reasons:
- mount an FX lens on a DX/FX camera and it will work fine
- mount a DX lens on a DX camera and it will work fine
- MOUNT A DX LENS ON AN FX CAMERA AND YOU WILL HAVE LIMITED RANGE
(ie. mount a 17-50 DX lens and you can only use it as 24-50mm)

Hope this helps (and hope I'm right as I'm still half asleep). :Grin:


You are partially correct here, compare the Field of View/Angle of View(FOV/AOV)
because some Nikon DX body has a cropped factor of 1.5 to 1.53.
To better understand the DX/FX lenses mounted on a DX/FX body go to
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/simulator/index.htm

hi, may i know if this lens can auto focus on D5000 body? thanks

get the one with BIM (Built In Motor)

You are partially correct here, compare the Field of View/Angle of View(FOV/AOV)
because some Nikon DX body has a cropped factor of 1.5 to 1.53.
To better understand the DX/FX lenses mounted on a DX/FX body go to
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/simulator/index.htm

Rey, thanks for posting this link. Its exactly where I got the learned this concept. :)

Hi guys just bought this lens yesterday and I am wondering how to spot if my copy is calibrated, backfocuses, front focuses or something like that? I have to check it as I have only a couple of days before I head back to work again on site. Thanks!:)

@Rambo Manalo, the easiest way that you can test your lens is the battery test.

For uniformity's sake [aka so as not to confuse us] DX lens numbers follow the FX. Hence, the 35mm 1.8 DX lens is actually a 52mm when mounted on a DX camera. So this 17-50 DX lens will be a 24-70mm when mounted on a DX lens.

They tell you the lens is DX or FX for the ff. reasons:
- mount an FX lens on a DX/FX camera and it will work fine
- mount a DX lens on a DX camera and it will work fine
- MOUNT A DX LENS ON AN FX CAMERA AND YOU WILL HAVE LIMITED RANGE
(ie. mount a 17-50 DX lens and you can only use it as 24-50mm)

Hope this helps (and hope I'm right as I'm still half asleep). :Grin:

Hi Hermie. In order to minimize confusion, your 24-70mm lens or a 50mm will always remain the same. One of the major difference between the FX and DX is the field of view since the DX has a narrower Field of View (FOV) hence they call it "crop" view. DX does not multiply the lens effective focal length, it just narrows it for you which make it seem like it's been zoomed. In reality the 50mm lens is still and will remain a 50mm and only the FOV is changed. When you mount a 50mm on FX, you get to see what was "cropped" from the DX FOV which is now a wider FOV on FX.

Here is a better demonstration from wikipedia. I hope this helps.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Full-frame_vs_APS-C.svg (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f5/Full-frame_vs_APS-C.svg)


When using a DX lens on a FX camera such as the D700, the maximum mega pixels that you can get is about 5MP. A 17-50mm DX lens will remain a 17-50mm but with a crop view and limited MP when mounted on a FX since the D700 will recognize that the lens being used is a DX lens. This does not apply if you are using a FX compatible lens which can be used on either camera without limited MP. DX are slightly cheaper and lighter. I hope this helps.

@Rambo Manalo, the easiest way that you can test your lens is the battery test.

Whats the battery test?

Just got a copy at MAYERS hope i get. Good lens

Whats the battery test?

Just got a copy at MAYERS hope i get. Good lens

I ain't that good explaining stuff so better get the feed from here:

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=191235
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=1908146&postcount=11

dennis: thanks for the link.

getting a bnew 17-50 non VC lens for 16k a good price ?

dennis: thanks for the link.

getting a bnew 17-50 non VC lens for 16k a good price ?

Yes it is. :D Yesterday I called one of the shop in hidalgo that the price of non-VC cost 22k and with VC is around P23,500. From what store? Coz I'm planning to get one. :D

this lens never failed me

Got the lens from Mang Ramon may free filter pa :) iba talaga pag good mood si mang ramon

Got the lens from Mang Ramon may free filter pa :) iba talaga pag good mood si mang ramon

How much? :Grin:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2736/5710353742_49ab77f6e8_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/5709782583_61e2bc5343_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2689/5702908019_3578fb24ac_z.jpg

Thanks for the reply guys regarding the front/back focus test. I did that and I think I have a back focusing copy. How can I fix this? Can the store fix this? I get backfocusing issues only on AF, when I switch to MF, it's gone. It is just freakin annoying. please help!:(

Thanks for the reply guys regarding the front/back focus test. I did that and I think I have a back focusing copy. How can I fix this? Can the store fix this? I get backfocusing issues only on AF, when I switch to MF, it's gone. It is just freakin annoying. please help!:(

the back/front focus problem only happens on AF. have it calibrated with your camera, you're in luck if the camera body you have has lens micro-adjust, then you can do it yourself.

http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu35/donbong/San%20Francisco/_DSC4337.jpg (http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu35/donbong/San%20Francisco/_DSC4337.jpg) http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu35/donbong/San%20Francisco/_DSC4352.jpg (http://i631.photobucket.com/albums/uu35/donbong/San%20Francisco/_DSC4352.jpg)

the back/front focus problem only happens on AF. have it calibrated with your camera, you're in luck if the camera body you have has lens micro-adjust, then you can do it yourself.

Thanks Jomi for the input. I will have my camera and lens calibrated. I am just amazed when I look in the viewfinder during AF and the subject seems sharp enough, when you hit the shutter and look at the result, the focus is a bit off. sheesh, I might have to live with manual focus for a bit until I have it calibrated.

If I have it calibrated, will my other lenses be affected in terms of focus accuracy?

Where can you calibrate this lens?

Thanks Jomi for the input. I will have my camera and lens calibrated. I am just amazed when I look in the viewfinder during AF and the subject seems sharp enough, when you hit the shutter and look at the result, the focus is a bit off. sheesh, I might have to live with manual focus for a bit until I have it calibrated.

If I have it calibrated, will my other lenses be affected in terms of focus accuracy?
what is your camera model? not sure if the focus of your other lenses would be affected. but with micro-adjust it is recorded as per lens, around 20 slots i think.

got my 1st dslr d90, and this tammy from tipidpc.. do i still need to have this lens calibrated w/ the d90?

got my 1st dslr d90, and this tammy from tipidpc.. do i still to need to have this lens calibrated w/ the d90?

if the backfocus is that bad, maybe you should, but then it is up to you.

what is your camera model? not sure if the focus of your other lenses would be affected. but with micro-adjust it is recorded as per lens, around 20 slots i think.


I have the D90. I havent heard of micro adjust with it. where do you think is the best place to have both lens and camera calibrated? thanks again. I might consider that microadjust feature when the time for upgrading comes.

I have the D90. I havent heard of micro adjust with it. where do you think is the best place to have both lens and camera calibrated? thanks again. I might consider that microadjust feature when the time for upgrading comes.

D300s and D7000 DX cameras have auto fine adjust. It is a very handy feature that is worth having which is why it's better to get these cameras including the built-in sensor cleaning feature.

D300s and D7000 DX cameras have auto fine adjust. It is a very handy feature that is worth having which is why it's better to get these cameras including the built-in sensor cleaning feature.

wow. really? the D7000 has it? another reason to consider that ISO beast haha! thanks for the input Glenn.:Grin:

Finally i found THE thread to get consult. Im thinking of getting this lens, but i am torn between getting the BIM or nonBIM version. I have a motorized body (D80) so nonBIM is no problem. I am concerned about IQ, focus accuracy, and speed between the two. I did go through the thread and read that the old nonBIM focuses faster. But the BIM is newer (and maybe better IQ?) Are there other tradeoffs between the two?

Also, are the VC versions worth it? how much stops improvement you get and is sharpness really sacrificed?

the 1st generation , non BIM is the performer above all. go for it. you will never regret buying this lens. I tried and satisfied. i just need to sell it coz i dont need it anymore

I was able to get a first gen copy from TPC. And the seller actually posted photos in one of the pages of this thread saving me the trouble of having to worry about it being a sharp copy. I am extremely happy with the versatility of this lens. AF is indeed fast (actually faster than AF-S lenses that ive tried so far). If i have the money the next upgrade would be the Nikor 24-70 but this lens would be my all around lens for a long while. This thread has been very educational =)

Been on the hunt for this no BIM version this past two weeks. found two of them on other local sites. tried them out both on my D90, back focus on wide end eg didn't buy the elusive no BIM version. but my camera has no BF issues with my other nikkor lenses. so if you'll have it (ur Tamron) calibrated with your camera body, you might have issues when you switch to your other lenses.
I'm still on the hunt. :-p

My 'elusive' 1st Gen TAMRON (NO BIM) Is one of my favorite, still is But I'm on a prime-stage right now and haven't really used it for the last 5 months , . The Tammy's slightly yellowish warm cast is one of the most unique in any lens that I have ever used , it's so sharp it can even rival the New 50mm's vaunted sharpness at f/3.5 (Of course the 50mm G wins by a hair, as this lens is probably one of the sharpest 50mm ever made by any brand) But for a Zoom Lens this sharp and cheap..I'd call it stellar

The sweet spot is at f/5.6

Center crop of each shot (Occupying 1/3 of the frame) NO Post Processing

Tamron at f/3.5 50mm | ISO 200 | 1/400th sec

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5036/5915572109_eddcb2648b_b.jpg (http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5036/5915572109_eddcb2648b_b.jpg)


Nikkor 50mm 1.8G (Same settings)

http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6131/5915572309_b003ce6baa_b.jpg (http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6131/5915572309_b003ce6baa_b.jpg)


Corner sharpness is almost even at at f/4, I'm not too anal about edge to edge sharpness especially when I shoot single subject isolation , for landscapes at f/9 + , it's pure awesomeness, even sharper than my Sigma 10-20 at 17mm which I consider it already sharp

The Downside : Horrible bokeh...I think it's even worse than the 35mm DX, but nontheless Perfect for travel and street photography

AF Speed is comparable to the 50mm 1.8 AF-D, the BIM version however is much slower


Here's my copy of the TAMMY, Check out the Serial number \m/ haha ... I will never ever sell it even if somebody would offer me a price for more than what I paid for it brand new...:Grin: too bad I don't use it anymore (Zoom lenses in general) because I find the 2.8 aperture really slow to freeze motion for an ISO of 100-200 setting. But If I had to (forcibly) carry just one lens that does it all, well, at least for my own style of Photography, It'll be this one.

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5274/5916134224_1d43f55bac_z.jpg (http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5274/5916134224_1d43f55bac_z.jpg)

image quality is superb of this lens. I may compare it almost similar with my Nikkor 24-70 2.8G.. i only hates it coz of slow focus as kenneth said. very far in that aspect compare to my nikon

Hi,

Was wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction where I could buy one specifically with a Canon mount? :) And also, roughly how much it would be.

Thanks and seriously loving the lens especially after seeing the test shots on this thread.

-Nik

I also bought tamron 17-50 2.8 BIM lastg year for my d90 as backup camera, Back focus issue (wide end), front focus (long end).
I wish i bought nikon 17-55. Lucky to those who doesn't have the issue. :)